EPISTEMOLOGICAL DISCOURSE IN A POLITARIAL SOCIETY: CONCEPTUAL OPPOSITION “COGNITIVE” – “RITUAL”

The article describes the socio-cultural situation in which the individual professionally working on scientific and mathematical problems turns out in politary society (ancient Egypt and Babylon, India and China, medieval Arab-Muslim world, etc.). It focuses on the complex relationship between scientists seeking to uncover the mysteries of nature, and the clergy whose aim is complete control of the process and results of any cognitive activities. Hierocratic estate allows research only to the extent that is necessary for the consolidation of its prerogatives and powers. The conflict of these two cognitive trends largely determines the general character and peculiarities of scientific-cognitive activity in these societies. Existing sacral picture of the world is considered as a firm and perfect one, requiring only minor refinements and specifications. While rituals, committed by clergy, positioned as a necessary condition for the preservation of the natural and social world order. On the contrary, sovereign scientific discourse implies that scientist has a right on free revision of existing views as about the world in general and about specific details of its devices and evolution. The scientist also should not be restricted in finding and applying specific means and methods of cognition of truth. Accordingly, the performance of rituals cannot play a significant role in the picture of the world which is created by scholar’s work. Patterns found in the natural processes are independent from actions committed by various people, including the sacred ceremonies of both ordinary and very senior individuals of spiritual title. Proto-scientific concepts of the universe and particular consequents from them are treated by hierocracyas godless and heretical. In the absence of adequate empirical and theoretical arguments, priests and theologians have to resort in struggle against scholar’s freethinking to force “arguments”. But scientists under favorable conditions can successfully resist this pressure and continue their professional work.

1. Averroes (Ibn Rushd). Oproverzhenie oproverzheniia [Incoherence of the Incoherence]. Kiyev, UTsIIM-Press; Saint-Petersburg, Aleteyya, 1999. 688 p. (In Russian).

2. Biruni A.R. Pamiatniki minuvshikh pokolenii [The Remaining Signs of Past Centuries]. Izbrannye proizvedeniia. T. I. [Selected works. Vol. I.]. Tashkent, Publishing house of UzSSR, 1957. 488 p. (In Russian).

3. Bulgakov P.B., Rozenfel’d B.A. Kommentarii k traktatu «Obosoblenie rechi o problemakh tenei» [Commentary on tractate «Separation of speech about the problems of shadows»]. Beruni A.R. Izbrannye proizvedeniia. T.VII [Beruni A. R. Selected works. T. VII]. Tashkent, Fan, 1987. pp. 286-326 (In Russian).

4. Vasechko V.Iu. Uchenyi v politarnom obshchestve: al’ternativy nravstvennogo vybora [Scientist in the politary society: the alternatives of moral choice]. Virtus. Scientific Journal. November, 2017a, Issue. 18, pp. 15-21 (In Russian).

5. Vasechko V.Iu. Uchenyi v politarnom sotsiume: sopriazhennost’ professional’nogo i smyslozhiznennogo diskursa [Scientist in the politary society: relationship between professional and meaning-of-life discourse]. Diskurs Pi. Nauchnyi zhurnal - Discourse PI. Scientific journal, 2017b, no. 2 (27), pp. 48-57 (In Russian).

6. Vasechko V.Iu. «Ontika» i «ontologiia»: estestvennonauchnyi diskurs protiv ierokraticheskogo pressinga v politarnom obshchestve [«Ontics» and «ontology»: scientific discourse against hierocratic pressure in politary society]. Virtus. Scientific Journal. September, 2018, Issue 26, pp. 17-20 (In Russian).

7. Vasechko V.Iu., Purgin S.P. Drevniaia i srednevekovaia vostochnaia filosofiia [Ancient and medieval Eastern philosophy]. Ekaterinburg, Publishing House of Ural University, 2017. 196 p. (In Russian).

8. Vasil’ev L.S. Kul’ty, religii, traditsii v Kitae. - 2-e izd. [Cults, religions, traditions in China - 2nd ed.]. Moscow, Publishing company «Eastern literature» RAS, 2001. 488 p. (In Russian).

9. Volodarskii A.I. Ocherki istorii srednevekovoi indiiskoi matematiki [Essays on the history of medieval Indian mathematics]. Moscow, Science, 1977. 184 p. (In Russian).

10. Korostovtsev M.A. Literatura Drevnego Egipta [The Literature Of Ancient Egypt]. Istoriia vsemirnoi literatury: V 9 tt. T.1. [The history of the world literature in 9 volumes vol. 1]. Moscow, Science, 1983. pp. 54-82 (In Russian).

11. Livshits I. Tsar’ Kheops i volshebniki [King Cheops and the magicians]. [Tales of Ancient Egypt]. Skazki Drevnego Egipta [Tales of Ancient Egypt]. Moscow, Aleteya, 1998. pp. 217-234 (In Russian).

12. Omar Khaiiam. Pervyi algebraicheskii traktat [The first algebraic treatise]. Istoriko-matematicheskie issledovaniia. Vyp. XV [Historical and mathematical studies. Issue. XV]. Moscow, Fizmatgiz, 1963. pp. 445-472 (In Russian).

13. Rozenfel’d B.A., Iushkevich A.P. Omar Khaiiam [Omar Khayyam]. Moscow, Science, 1965. 192 p. (In Russian).

14. Semenov Iu.I. Politarnyi («aziatskii») sposob proizvodstva: sushchnost’ i mesto v istorii chelovechestva i Rossii. - 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. [Political («Asian») method of production: the essence and place in the history of mankind and Russia. - 2nd ed., revised and enlarged. Moscow, URSS, 2011. 376 p. (In Russian).

15. Sultanov Sh.Z., Sultanov K.Z. Omar Khaiiam [Omar Khayyam]. Moscow, Young guard, 2007. 320 p. (In Russian).

16. Torchinov E.A. Daosizm: Opyt istoriko-religioznogo opisaniia [Taoism: The experience of the historical-religious descriptions]. Saint-Petersburg, LAN’, 1998. 448 p. (In Russian).

17. Shidfar B.Ia. Ibn Sina [Ibn Sina]. Moscow, Home edition Oriental literature, “Nauka”, 1981. 1841981. 184 p. (In Russian).

18. Ebrakhimi T.A. I geolog, i alkhimik … [And geologist, and alchemist ...]. Zagadki staroi Persii [Puzzles of old Persia]. Moscow, Veche, 2010. Available at: http:// rulibs.com. (accessed 05 June 2018) (In Russian).