Preview

Concept: philosophy, religion, culture

Advanced search

STUDY OF RELIGION AS A STRICT SCIENCE

https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2019-3-11-47-64

Abstract

The present article by Andrey Pavlovich Zabiyako, the Doctor of Philosophy, professor, the head of the department of religious studies and history, the head of the laboratory of archeology and anthropology of Amur state university, professor of department of philosophy and religious studies of School of arts and the humanities of Far Eastern Federal University, the editor-in-chief of the “Religious studies”, brings up and discusses the main questions and problems of modern religious studies as a science. According to him, religious studies arose already more than a hundred years ago, but the process of its isolation from other types of scientific and unscientific knowledge is still incomplete; therefore there is a need of an accurate boundary demarcation of religious studies as a science. First of all these lines should be drawn on the fields of contact of religious studies with philosophy and theology. Such a boundary demarcation is a guarantee of successful interaction between different types of knowledge. The development of religious studies is caused first of all by the progress of humanitarian and natural sciences. Since the beginning of the 21st century the latest discoveries in the field of anthropogenesis and culture genesis has had a particular importance for the science of religion. Huge successes of archeology and anthropology led actually to scientific revolution in understanding of the problems of origin and evolution of mankind, its culture, religion. Religious studies is a science which comprises, on the one hand, the level of knowledge of fundamental type, on the other hand, the level of applied knowledge. Religion is closely twisted in surrounding reality of social, political, ethnic life. Therefore examination problem is one of the most important issues of religious studies as a strict science. The procedure for the materials’ scientific expertise, methods of interpretation of empirical data, and outputs should be based on a uniform, strictly scientific basis within the expert community. Developing fundamental and applied components, the religious studies approves itself not only as a strict, but also as a necessary science.

About the Author

A. P. Zabiyako
Laboratory of Archeology and Anthropology of Amur State University
Russian Federation

Zabiyako Andrei Pavlovich – Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Head of the Department of Religious Studies and History, Head.

675027, Amur Region, Blagoveshchensk, st. Student, 20



References

1. Zabiiako A.P. Religiovedenie v Rossii [Religious Studies in Russia]. Religiovedenie. Entsikloped. Slovar’ [Religious Studies. Entsikloped.dictionary] / Ed. A.P. Zabiyako A.N. Krasnikova, E.S. Elbakyan. Moscow, Academic project, 2006. pp. 859-861 (In Russian).

2. Zabiiako A.P. Genezis religii: vozniknovenie zoolatrii po materialam naskal’nykh izobrazhenii [Genesis of Religion: Emergence of Zoolatia from Materials of Rock Images]. Religiovedenie - Religious studies, 2018, no. 4, pp. 5-25 (In Russian).

3. Istoriia religiovedeniia i intellektual’naia istoriia Rossii XIX – pervoi poloviny XX veka. Arkhivnye materialy i issledovaniia [History of religious studies and intellectual history of Russia of the 19th - the first half of the 20th century] / Ed. M.M. Shakhnovich, E.A. Teryukova. Saint-Petersburg, Publishing House of St. Petersburg University, 2018. 520 p. (In Russian).

4. Piniugina E.V. Integratsiia musul’man v sovremennoe evropeiskoe gosudarstvo (na primere Velikobritanii i FRG): dis. … kand. polit. nauk [Integration of Muslims into the modern European state (on the example of Great Britain and Germany): dis. … kand. polit. sci. Moscow, 2010. 267 p. (In Russian).

5. Piniugina E.V. Problema immigratsii i kontseptsiia «vedushchei kul’tury» v nemetskoi politike [The problem of immigration and the concept of «leading culture» in German politics]. Rossiia i mir: anatomiia sovremennykh protsessov [Russia and the world: the anatomy of modern processes.]. Moscow, International Relations, 2014. pp. 246-273 (In Russian).

6. Boyer P. Et l’hommecréa les dieux. Comment expliquer la religion. Paris, Robert Laffont, 2001. 361 p. (In French).

7. Pettitt P.B. The Neanderthal dead: exploring mortuary variability in Middle Palaeolithic. Eurasia Before Farming, 2002, Vol. 1 (4), pp. 1-19.

8. Pomeroy, Emma, Lahr, Marta Mirazόn, Crivellaro, Federica, Farr, Lucy, Reynolds, Tim, Hunt, Chris O., Barker, Graeme. Newly discovered Neanderthal remains from Shanidar Cave, Iraqi, Kurdistan, and their attribution to Shanidar 5. Journal of Human Evolution, 2017, no. 111, pp. 102-118.

9. Première Humanitė. Gestesfunėraires des Nėandertaliens. Paris, Ėditions de la Rėunion des musėenationaux, 2008. 143 p. (In French).


Review

For citations:


Zabiyako A.P. STUDY OF RELIGION AS A STRICT SCIENCE. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2019;(3):47-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2019-3-11-47-64

Views: 836


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-8831 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0540 (Online)