INTRODUCTION TO SECULAR GENOLOGY
https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2019-3-11-65-77
Abstract
The search for the origins of the secular is important for science because it clarifies the concept of “secular” as a category of modern thought against the background of rethinking the classical theory of secularization and uprising of post-secular concepts. The article argues that despite many different approaches to the definition of the secular there is a common thing that unites them — the recognition of religion as a finite area and the existence of the “non-religious”. The article presents the positions of well-known scientists who tried to explain the origin of the category of the secular within social sciences, including those who challenge the classical theory of secularization. In search of the signs of uprising the “secular” in culture a researcher can consistently dive into history and find them in almost any historical era. But such a search inevitably leads to the final borders of social sciences beyond which the theological discourse begins. Even those researchers who consistently defend secular principles (Berger) face this problem. In this regard some researchers continue their studies in the theological plane (Trostnikov, Milbank). There is also a potential problem here — artificial construction of new concepts of “secularities” which would have no relation to the “secular” itself. Therefore the reconstruction of the genealogy of the secular makes sense only if it helps to explain the logic of modern social and ideological processes. From this point of view the researcher has no choice: even before he determines where the secular begins, he already states that the secular has become itself in the Christian paradigm (theological, geographical and chronological); right here it has acquired the problem field in which the culture of modernity and the paradigm of modern scientific knowledge exist. The author concludes that the development of secular discourse is also a theological process.
About the Author
V. A. ShchipkovRussian Federation
Vasiliy A. Shchipkov – Ph.D. in Philosophy, Associate Professor at the Department of International Journalism.
76 Prospekt Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454, Russia
References
1. Vallerstain I. Tom I. Kapitalisticheskoe sel’skoe khoziaistvo i istoki evropeiskogo mira-ekonomiki v XVI veke [Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century]. Moscow, Russian Fund of assistance to education and science, 2016. 552 p. (In Russian).
2. Guardini R. Konets novogo vremeni [The end of new time]. Voprosy filosofii - Questions of philosophy, 1990, no. 4, pp. 127-163 (In Russian).
3. Gosudarstvo, religiia, Tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom [State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide], 2012, no. 2 (30).
4. Kargina I.G. Sotsiologicheskie refleksii sovremennogo religioznogo pliuralizma [Sociological reflections of modern religious pluralism]. Moscow, MGIMO-University, 2014. 278 p. (In Russian).
5. Pamiati Iulii Iur’evny Sinelinoi. Nauchnye trudy, vospominaniia [In Memory Of Yulia Yurievna Sinelina. Scientific works, memories]. Moscow, ISPI RAS, 2014. 592 p. (In Russian).
6. Silant’eva M. V. Religiia v pole tsivilizatsionnykh konfliktov: sposoby profilaktiki [Religion in the Sphere of Civilizational Conflicts: Methods of Prophylaxis]. Religiovedenie - Religious Studies, 2018, no. 4, pp. 118-125 (In Russian).
7. Sinelina Iu.Iu. Kontseptsii sekuliarizatsii v sotsiologicheskoi teorii [Concepts of secularization in sociological theory]. Moscow, ISPI RAS, 2009. 120 p. (In Russian).
8. Tillich P. Khristianstvo i vstrecha mirovykh religii [Christianity and the encounter of the world religions]. Izbrannoe. Teologiia kul’tury [Favorites. Theology of culture]. Moscow, 1995. pp. 396-431 (In Russian).
9. Trostnikov V.N. Mysli pered rassvetom [Thoughts before dawn]. Paris, YMCA-Press, 1980. 360 p. (In Russian).
10. Shchipkov V.A. Postsekuliarnaia rech’. Tsennostnoe izmerenie sovremennykh kul’turnykh i politicheskikh protsessov [Post-secular speech.Value dimension of current cultural and political processes]. Moscow, MGIMO-University, 2019. 302 p. (In Russian).
11. Shchipkov V.A., Belzhelarskii E.A., Mamaev E.E. Filosofskie osnovaniia i propagandistskie praktiki ideologii transgumanizma [Philosophical grounds and propaganda practices of the ideology of transhumanism]. Moscow, Russian Expert School, 2018. 128 p. (In Russian).
12. Berger P. Toward a New Paradigm for Modernity and Religion. Patocka Memorial Lecture. Wien Museum Atrium. 28.04.2016. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kNkr-x6XwI (accessed 30 April 2019).
13. Dreher R. The Benedict option : a strategy for Christians in a post-Christian nation. New York, Sentinel, 2017.262 p.
14. Mannheim K. Ideologie und Utopie. Bonn, Verlag von Friedrich Cohen, 1929. 250 s. (In German).
15. Milbank J. Beyond Secular Order: The Representation of Being and the Representation of the People. Oxford, West Sussex, MA, Wiley-Blackwell. 2014. 288 p.
16. Milbank J. Theology & Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason. MA, Oxford, Victoria, Blackwell Publishing. 2006. 484 p.
17. Wallerstein I. The West, Capitalism, and the Modern World-System, China and Historical Capitalism: Genealogies of Sinological Knowledge / T. Brook & G. Blue, eds. New York, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002. P. 56.
Review
For citations:
Shchipkov V.A. INTRODUCTION TO SECULAR GENOLOGY. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2019;(3):65-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2019-3-11-65-77