AT THE START OF ANTHROPOGENESIS: HARD ENVIRONMENTS OR APPETENT ACTIVITY?
https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2018-2-6-19-32
Abstract
To any extent, many hypotheses of anthropogenesis suppose hard environments as a trigger of anthropogenesis and culture genesis. This supposition is represented in some manuals of anthropology as well. But, was hard environments really a trigger of anthropogenesis? The analysis of recent critics of “East Side story” and “Savannah” hypotheses makes us to doubt if this idea is really true. Thus, nowadays we know that the East African rift in reality was not an impenetrable area for early hominids. Next, and more important, that in Miocene and for much of Pliocene early hominids inhabited well-wooded to forested environments, and not savannah. These, and some other facts do not allow, I think, to explain the beginning of anthropogenesis and culture genesis by the hypothesis of “hard environments”. The alternative explanation is required. This sought explanation would be based on the idea of interaction of two main factors as driving forces of anthropogenesis and culture genesis: the appetent activity (namely endogenous appetent activity, first of all) and, second, the priority of challenges of “internal environments” (i.e., the environments created by interactions inside of and between populations of hominids) over the challenges of “external” environments. Thus, I think that even at the start of anthropogenesis early hominids had not had any real contestants besides themselves. And this was the main reason that made them become a thinking being.
About the Author
A. A. Romanchuk
Higher Anthropological School; Institute of Cultural Heritage of ASM
Moldova, Republic of
Moldova, Republic of
Alexey A. Romanchuk – Senior Lecturer of the Department of Anthropology and Social Technologies
Researcher
MD-2024, Moldova, Chisinau, Str. Zimbrului, 10A
References
1. Bkhagvati D. V zashchitu globalizatsii [In defence of globalization]. Moscow, Ladomir, 2005. 451 p. (In Russian).
2. Vishniatskii L.B. Istoriia odnoi sluchainosti, ili Proiskhozhdenie cheloveka [History of one chance, or Origin of man]. Berlin, Stratumplus 1, 1999. pp. 10-51. (In Russian).
3. Vishniatskii L.B. Vvedenie v preistoriiu [Introduction to prehistory]. Chisinau, Antropologicheskaya High School, 2005a. 396 p. (In Russian).
4. Vishniatskii L.B. Istoriia odnoi sluchainosti, ili Proiskhozhdenie cheloveka [History of one chance, or Origin of man]. Fryazino, Age 2, 2005b. 240 p. (In Russian).
5. Golubovskii M.D. Vek genetiki: evoliutsiia idei i poniatii [Age of Genetics: evolution of ideas and concepts]. Saint-Petersburg, Borey Art, 2000. 262 p. (In Russiav).
6. Grodnitskii D.L. Dve teorii biologicheskoi evoliutsii [Two theories of biological evolution]. Saratov, Scientific book, 2002. 160 p. (In Russian).
7. Grushevitskaia T.G., Sadokhin A.P. Kul’turologiia: uchebnik [Culturology: textbook]. Moscow, Unity, 2010. 683 p. (In Russian).
8. Drach G.V. Kul’turologiia: uchebnik [Culturology: textbook]. Moscow, Alpha-M, 2003. 432 p. (In Russian).
9. Kroitor R.V. O predpolagaemoi ekologicheskoi sviazi mezhdu rannimi vidami Homo i sablezubymi koshkami [About the supposed ecological connection between the early types of Homo and saber-toothed cats]. Berlin, RevistaArheologică (S. N.), 2008, Vol. IV, no. 2, pp. 218-238 (In Russian).
10. Pelipenko A.A. Chelovek mezhdu prirodoi i kul’turoi [ Persons between nature and culture]. Voprosy sotsial’noi teorii - Questions of social theory, 2011, Vol. V, pp. 344-371 (In Russian).
11. Radugin A.A. Kul’turologiia: uchebnoe posobie [Culturology: train aid]. Moscow, The Center, 2001. 304 p. (In Russian).
12. Reznikova Zh.I., Panteleeva S.N. Vozmozhnye evoliutsionnye mekhanizmy “kul’tury” u zhivotnykh: gipoteza raspredelennogo sotsial’nogo obucheniia [Possible evolutional mechanisms of “culture” for animals: hypothesis of the up-diffused social educating]. Zhurnal obshchei biologii - Journal of General biology, 2015, Vol. 76 (4), pp. 295-309 (In Rusian).
13. Rozin V.M. Kul’turologiia: uchebnik [Culturology: textbook]. Moscow, Gardariki, 2003. 462 p. (In Rusian).
14. Romanchuk A.A. Vremia cheloveka: zametki k demograficheskoi teorii istorii [Time of man: notes to the demographic theory of history]. Stratum plus - Stratum plus, 2006, no. 2, pp. 407-438 (In Rusian).
15. Romanchuk A.A. Preistoriia [Prehistory]. V: Kurrikulum Universiteta «Vysshaia Antropologicheskaia Shkola». Spetsial’nost’: 225.1 Antropologiia [B: Curriculum Of The University “Higher Anthropological School”. Specialty: 225.1 Anthropology]. Chisinau, Stratumplus, 2011a. pp. 30-31 (In Rusian).
16. Romanchuk A.A. Krivye zerkala «mal’tuzianskikh lovushek»: proiskhozhdenie, periodizatsiia i demograficheskaia dinamika Kul’tur Reznoi i Shtampovannoi Keramiki Karpato-Podnestrov’ia (12 – seredina 8 vv. do R. Kh) [Crooked mirrors of “Maltus traps”: origin, division into periods and demographic dynamics of Cultures of the Fretted and Pressed Ceramics of Carpathian-Transdniestria (12th-mid-8th centuries BC). Saarbrücken, Lambert Academic Publishing, 2011b. 144 p. (In Rusian).
17. Savel’ev S.V. Dvoistvennost’ povedeniia primatov [Duality of behavior of primacies]. Available at: http://ethology.ru/library/?id=262 (accessed 26 March 2018) (In Rusian).
18. Skovorodkin V.M. Kul’turologiia: Uchebnoe posobie [Culturology: train aid]. Moscow, Moscow state industrial University, 2000. 254 p. (In Rusian).
19. Fainberg L.A. U istokov sotsiogeneza [At the sources of sociogenesis]. Moscow, Science. 1980. 153 p. (In Rusian).
20. Shmal’gauzen I. I. Faktory evoliutsii [Factors of evolution]. Moscow, Science, 1968. 458 p. (In Rusian).
21. Arguea D., Grovesa C., Leeb M., Jungers W. The affinities of Homo floresiensis based on phylogenetic analyses of cranial, dental, and postcranial characters. Journal of Human Evolution, 2017, Vol. 107, pp. 107-133.
22. Brunet M. Two new Mio-Pliocene Chadian hominids enlighten Charles Darwin’s 1871 prediction. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society B, 2010, no. 365, pp. 3315-3321.
23. Coppens Y. East Side Story: The Origin of Humankind. Scientific American, 1994, Vol. 270, no. 5, pp. 88-95.
24. Dart R.A. Australopithecus africanus: The Man-Ape of South Africa. Nature, 1925, Vol. 115, no. 2884, pp. 195-199.
25. Domínguez-Rodrigo M. Is the “Savanna Hypothesis” a Dead Concept for Explaining the Emergence of the Earliest Hominins?, Current Anthropology 55, 2014, no. 1, pp. 59-81.
26. Heinzelin de J., Clark J., White T., Hart W., Renne P., Wolde Gabriel W., Beyene Y., Vrba E. Environment and Behavior of 2.5-Million-Year-Old Bouri Hominids. Science, 1999, no. 23, pp. 625-629.
27. Koops K., Furuichi T., Hashimoto Ch. Chimpanzees and bonobos differ in intrinsic motivation for tool use. Available at: www.nature.com/scientificreports (accessed 26 March 2018).
28. Kortlandt A. New perspectives on ape and human evolution. Amsterdam, Stichting voor Psychobiologie, 1972. 100 p.
29. Kortlandt A., Kleindienst M.R., Burton F.D. On new perspectives on ape and human evolution. Current Anthropology, 1975, Vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 644-651.
30. Leeuwen van E., Cronin K., Haun D. A group-specific arbitrary tradition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Animal Cognition, 2014, Vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1421-1425.
31. Maslin M., Shultz S, Trauth M. A synthesis of the theories and concepts of early human evolution. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0064 (accessed 26 March 2018).
32. Potts D. Environmental Hypotheses of Hominin Evolution. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 1998, Vol. 41, pp. 93-136.
33. Potts R. Environmental hypotheses of Pliocene human evolution. Hominin Environments in the East African Pliocene: An Assessment of the Faunal Evidence / Bobe R., Alemseged Z., Behrensmeyer A.K (eds.). Dordreeth, Springer, 2007. pp. 25-49.
34. Reynolds S. African Genesis: an evolving paradigm. African Genesis: Perspectives on hominin evolution / Reynolds S.C. and Gallagher A. (eds.). Cambridge, University Press, 2012. pp. 1-18.
35. Reynolds S., Wilkinson D., Marston Ch., O’Regan H. The “mosaic habitat” concept in human evolution: past and present. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa, 2015, Vol. 70 (1), pp. 57-69.
36. Romanchuk А. Anthropogenesis as a Fluke: The Problem of Non-random Causes of Hominid Evolution. Fifth International Conference Hierarchy and power in the history of civilizations Available at: http:// www.inafran.ru/en/sites/default/files/page_file/abstracts.pdf (accessed 26 March 2018).
37. Schrenk F., Sandrock O., Kullmer O. An “Open Source” Perspective of Earliest Hominid Origins. Coll. Antropol, 2004, Vol. 28 (Suppl. 2), pp. 113-119.
38. Senut B., Pickford M., Gommery D., Ségalen L. Palaeoenvironments and the origin of hominid bipedalism. An International Journal of Paleobiology, 2018, Vol. 30 (Issue 1-2: SI: Tribute to Percy Milton Butler), pp. 284-296.
39. Wolpoff M., Hawks J., Senut B., Pickford M., Ahern J. An Ape or the Ape: Is the Toumaï Cranium TM 266 a Hominid? Paleo Anthropology, 2006, pp. 36-50.
Review
For citations:
Romanchuk A.A. AT THE START OF ANTHROPOGENESIS: HARD ENVIRONMENTS OR APPETENT ACTIVITY? Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2018;(2):19-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2018-2-6-19-32
Views:
614
Email this article 