Public Opinion as an Instrument of Socio-Cultural Influence in the Debate on the «NATO Option» in Finland

The article analyzes how the attitude of the Finnish population to Finland’s policy of military non-alignment correlates with the official foreign strategy. The question of public opinion can act as a possible sociocultural tool for its change is examined. The author explains the main reasons for the formation of stable public opinion in favor of neutrality, based on national and cultural identity. The role of public opinion in the Finnish internal debate on the «NATO option» is shown. The thesis that public opinion plays only an auxiliary role in comparison with external circumstances affecting the foreign policy of Finland, which is widespread in research circles, is considered. The author argues that public opinion on Finland’s possible entry into NATO is crucial in two key ways. First, at present, it’s a factor supporting the stable foreign policy decision, which is carried out by the state government. Secondly, in the future, public opinion may become a factor capable, under certain conditions of having a significant impact on the change of the Finnish course in foreign and security policy. The second option assumes that public opinion can play its own role by changing the pre-planned foreign policy scenario.

1. Aunesluoma J., Rainio-Niemi J. 2016. Neutrality as Identity? Finland’s Quest for Security in the Cold War. Journal of Cold War Studies. 18 (4). Р. 51-78. DOI: 10.1162/JCWS_a_00680.

2. Cottey A., ed. 2018. The European Neutrals and NATO. Non-alignment, Partnership, Membership? London: New Security Challenges. 237 p. DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-59524-9.

3. Himanen H. 2017. Länttävaiitää – Suomijageopolitiikanpaluu. Jyväskylä: Docendo. 242 p. (In Finnish).

4. Niemi M., Raunio T., Ruostetsaari, I. (ed.) 2017. Poliittinenvalta Suomessa. Tampere: Vastapaino. 349 p. (In Finnish).

5. Salomaa M. 2015. Puhutaan Natosta. Jyväskylä: Docendo. 302 p. (In Finnish).

6. Khaken G. 2000. Osnovnye poniatiia sinergetiki. Sinergeticheskaia paradigma: mnogoobrazie poiskov i podkhodov [Basic Concepts of Synergetics. Synergetic Paradigm: Diversity of Searches and Approaches]. Moscow: Progress, Traditsiia. 282 p. (In Russian).

7. KilinIu.M. 2017. Neitral’nye gosudarstva na rasput’e: problema vstupleniia v NATO Finliandii I Shvetsii [Neutral States at a Crossroads: the Problem of Finland and Sweden Joining NATO]. Sovremennaia Evropa. № 2. Р. 65-76. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope220176576 (In Russian).

8. Noel’-Noman E. 1996. Obshchestvennoe mnenie. Otkrytie spirali molchaniia [Public Opinion. Opening the Spiral of Silence]. Moscow: Progress-akademiia. 237 p. (In Russian).

9. Vakulenko A.S. 2013. Sistemno-sinergeticheskaia model’ funktsionirovaniia obshchestvennogo mneniia v sotsial’no-istoricheskom protsesse [System-Synergetic Model of Functioning of Public Opinion in the SocioHistorical Process]. Teoriia i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiia. № 10. Р. 32-34 (In Russian).

10. Vakulenko A.S. 2014. Obshchestvennoe mnenie v sotsial’no-istoricheskom protsesse [Public Opinion in the Socio-Historical Process]: аbstract of Ph.D. Thesis. Krasnodar. 23 p. (In Russian).

11. Vezhlivtseva N.Y. 2019. Neytralitet Finlyandii kak chast eyo nacionalnoy identichnosti [Finland’s Neutrality as Part of Its National Identity]. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2 (65). Р. 85-100. DOI 10.24833/2071-8160-2019-2-65-86-100 (In Russian).