Social transcending as a conceptual basis for understanding culture and society
https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-2-14-25-32
Abstract
About the Author
Zh. V. LatyshevaRussian Federation
Zhanna V. Latysheva – Doctor of Philosophy, Docent, Head of the Department of Journalism, Advertising and Public Relations, Professor
600000, Vladimir, Gorky str., 87
References
1. Alexander J.C. 2003. The Meanings of Social Life. A Cultural Sociology. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. 296 p.
2. Tymieniecka A.T. 1990. Introduction to Phenomenology of Life and the Human Condition. Logos and Life: Passions of the Soul and Elements in the Onto-Poiesis of Culture. Book 3. Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 141 p.
3. Schütz A. 1984. Strukturen der Lebenswelt. Band 2. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. 413 s. (In German).
4. Barthes R. 1957. Mythologies. Paris: Seuil. 218 p. (In French) (Russ. ed.: Barthes R. 2019. Mifologii. Per. s fr. S. Zenkina. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt. 351 p.).
5. Barulin V.S. 1994. Sotsial’no-filosofskaia antropologiia. Obshchie nachala sotsial’no-filosofskoi antropologii [Socio-philosophical anthropology. General principles of socio-philosophical anthropology]. Moscow: Onega. 256 p. (In Russian).
6. Berger P.L., Luckmann T. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on sociology of Knowledge. New York: Doubleday & Company. 249 p. (Russ. ed.: Berger P., Luckmann T. 1995. Sotsial’noe konstruirovanie real’nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniia. Moscow: Medium. 323 p.).
7. Chernavin G.I. 2012. K voprosu o sootnoshenii razlichnykh tipov teleologii v fenomenologii Gusserlia: teleologicheskii aspekt perekhoda k fenomenologicheskoi ustanovke [On the correlation of various types of teleology in Husserl’s phenomenology: the teleological aspect of the transition to a phenomenological installation]. Horizon. 1 (2). P. 7-40 (In Russian).
8. Gornostaeva M.V. 2010. Kreativnost’ cotsial’nogo deistviia po Kh. Ioasu – postulaty i predely [The Creativity of Social Action by H. Joas – Postulates and Limits]. Cotsiologicheskie issledovaniia. № 6. P. 23-26 (In Russian).
9. Kravchenko S.A. 2010. Kul’tural’naia sotsiologiia Dzh. Aleksandera (genezis, poniatiia vozmozhnosti instrumentariia) [Cultural sociology of J. Alexander (genesis, concepts of the possibility of tools)]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia. № 5. P. 13-22 (In Russian).
10. Kuchinov A.M. 2015. Sovremennye teorii structure-agency i russkaia sotsiologiia [Modern theories of structure-agency and Russian sociology]. Gumanitarnye nauchnye issledovaniia. № 4. Part 3. Available at: http://human.snauka.ru/2015/04/9598 (accessed 02.08.2019) (In Russian).
11. Lossky N.O. 1951. History of Russian Philosophy. New York: Intern. Univ. Press. 416 p. (Russ. ed.: Lossky N.O. 1991. Istoriia russkoi filosofii. Per. s angl. Moscow: Sovetskii pisatel’. 480 p.)
12. Ponizovkina I.F. 2017. Semiolog R. Bart i sotsial’nyi mif: sovremennoe prochtenie [Semiologist R. Barthes and Social Myth: A Modern Reading]. Vestnik REU im. G.V. Plekhanova. 5 (95), P. 190-197 (In Russian).
13. Rozov N.S. 2017. Kontseptualizatsiia sviazi structure/agency [Conceptualization of structure / agency communication]. Filosofiia i obshchestvo. № 1. P. 29-47 (In Russian).
14. Serteau M. de. 1980. L’invention du quotidien. I Arts de faire. Paris: Union generale d’editions. 347 p. (In French) (Russ. ed.: Serteau M. de. 2013. Izobretenie povsednevnosti. 1. Iskusstvo delat’. Per. s fr. D. Kalugina, N. Movninoi. Saint-Petersburg: Izd-vo Evrop. un-ta. 330 p.).
Review
For citations:
Latysheva Zh.V. Social transcending as a conceptual basis for understanding culture and society. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2020;4(2):25-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-2-14-25-32