Dialectics of Sobornost in the Works of S.N. Bulgakov and V.N. Lossky
https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-3-15-43-51
Abstract
The paper is dedicated to the philosophical debate on the notion of sobornost in the Russian religious philosophy of Sergei Nikolaevich Bulgakov and Vladimir Nikolaevich Lossky. As a universal concept it grasps the state-of-being-joined, the unity in both religious and civil, societal aspects. Both these forms of sociality are also rooted in personal attitudes and are manifested in the sphere of reflection and in the spiritual. The extent to which both views on sobornost differ lies on the level of individual and group aspirations, in various schemes of the sobornost formation, in the religious—secular dichotomy. In this way the concept of dialectics arises. All the aforenamed controversies and the historical development of collective forms (e.g. a conflict of sobornost in the social field of a secular society) (see Bulgakov) can be seen as the dialectical self-development of sobornost as the very being, being mediated by the essence (Lossky). It is found that the dialectics inevitably lead to personal, social and divine integrity, thus illustrating the inherent unity of sobornost as essence and as being. Conflicts and misunderstandings are only due to personal misinterpretations and sacred quest. Only in a threefold form can sobornost thrive, which is more profoundly reflected in the works of Bulgakov.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. V. TonkovidovaRussian Federation
Anna V. Tonkovidova — Senior Lecturer at the Department of Philosophy, Cultural Studies and Social Communications
350015, Krasnodar, Budennogo Str, 161
P. E. Boyko
Russian Federation
Pavel E. Boyko — Doctor of Sciences (Philosophy), Professor, Head of the Department of Philosophy
350015, Krasnodar, Stavropol’skaya Str., 149
References
1. Gallaher B. 2016. A Supertemporal Continuum’: Christocentric Trinity and the Dialectical Reenvisioning of Divine Freedom in Bulgakov and Barth. Correlating Sobornost: Conversations between Karl Barth and the Russian Othrodox Tradition. Ed. by Ashley John Moyse et al. Minneapolis: 1517 Media. P. 95-134. https://doi. org/10.2307/j.ctt17mcrxw.10
2. Antonov K.M. 2013. Filosofiia religii S.N. Bulgakova i problematika kontseptsii neopatristicheskogo sinteza V.N. Losskogo [Philosophy of Religion S.N. Bulgakov and Problems of the Neopatristic Synthesis Concept of V.N. Lossky]. Sofiologiia i neopatristicheskii sintez: dva bogoslovskikh itoga filosofskogo razvitiia: sbornik nauchnykh statei po itogam raboty sektsii po istorii russkoi mysli XXII Ezhegodnoi bogoslovskoi konferentsii PSTGU. Мoscow: PSTGU. P. 86-103. Available at: http://ivashek.com/ru/research/philosophy-research/618- filosofiya-religii-s-n-bulgakova-i-problematika-kontseptsii-neopatristicheskogo-sinteza-v-n-losskogo-antonov-k-m (accessed 05.06.2020) (In Russian).
3. Astapov S.N. 2009. Antinomiia v otritsatel’noi dialektike P.A. Florenskogo, S.N. Bulgakova, S.L. Franka [Antinomy in the Negative Dialectics of P.A. Florensky, S.N. Bulgakov, S.L. Frank]. Nauchnaia mysl’ Kavkaza. № 1 (57). Р. 54-58. (In Russian).
4. Bulgakov S.N. 2008. Dva grada: issledovaniia o prirode obshchestvennykh idealov [Two Cities: Study on the Nature of Social Ideals]. Мoscow: Astrel’. 784 p. (In Russian).
5. Bulgakov S.N. 2011. Pravoslavie. Ocherki ucheniia Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi [Orthodoxy. Essays on the Teachings of the Orthodox Church]. Minsk: Izdatel’stvo Belorusskogo Ekzarkhata. 560 p. (In Russian).
6. Bulgakov S. 2017. Svet nevechernii: Sozertsaniia i umozreniia [Unfading Light: Contemplation and Opin-ion]. Мoscow: Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus. 672 p. (In Russian).
7. Kireev V.K. 2008. Dialektika sobornosti [The Dialectics of Sobornost]. Vestnik VGU. Seriia: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaia kommunikatsiia. № 3. P. 245-249. (In Russian).
8. Kleman O. 2019. Vladimir Losskii, bogoslov lichnosti i sviatogo dukha [Vladimir Lossky, a Theologian of Personality and the Holy Spirit]. Voprosy teologii. 1 (2). P. 127-198.https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2019.201 (In Russian).
9. LosskijV.N. 2006. Bogovidenie [The Vision of God]. Moscow: AST. 769 p. (In Russian).
10. Preobrazhenskaya K.V. 2006. Khristianskoe ponimanie lichnosti v interpretatsii V.N. Losskogo [The Christian Understanding of Personality by V.N. Lossky]. Dialog otechestvennykh svetskoi i tserkovnoi obrazovatel’nykh traditsii. Dukhovnaia kul’tura kak osnova bezopasnosti i zdorov’ia lichnosti, sem’i, obshchestva: materialy Pokrovskikh chtenii, 2005-2006 gg. Saint-Petersburg: Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii universitet im. A. I. Gertsena. P. 225-232 (In Russian).
11. Preobrazhenskaya K.V. 2008. Bogoslovie i mistika v tvorchestve Vladimira Losskogo [Theology and Mysticism in the Works of Vladimir Lossky]. Saint-Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. 136 p. (In Russian)
12. Preobrazhenskaya K.V. 2019. S. Bulgakov i Vl. Losskii. Spor o Sofii kak stolknovenie dvukh protivopolozhnykh misticheskikh intuitsii [S. Bulgakov and Vl. Lossky. The Argument on Sophia as a Clash of Two Opposing Mystical Intuitions]. Vestnik RKhGA. № 2. P. 126-134. (In Russian).
13. Senina O.V. 2011. Dukhovnye iskaniia S.N. Bulgakova i ikh otrazhenie v ego filosofskoi sisteme [The Sacred Quest of S. N. Bulgakov and the Reflections on His Philosophical System]. Izvestiia Saratovskogo universiteta. Seriia Filosofiia. Psikhologiia. Pedagogika. № 1. P. 40-43. (In Russian).
14. Hondzinskij P.V., Kyrlezhev A.I. 2019. Sobornost’ v russkoi bogoslovskoi traditsii [Sobornost in Russian Theological Tradition]. Voprosy teologii. 1 (3). P. 427-440. http://doi.org/10.21638/spbu28.2019.307 (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Tonkovidova A.V., Boyko P.E. Dialectics of Sobornost in the Works of S.N. Bulgakov and V.N. Lossky. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2020;4(3):43-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-3-15-43-51