Virtualization of Religious Communities as a Key Tool to Understanding the Evolution of Sociological Concepts of Religiosity

The article considers the evolution of the sociological vision of religiosity. The relevance of the topic raised is due to the demarcation between the religious and the secular the late Modern and personal identification. The purpose of the article is to outline the retrospective and perspective of sociological studies of religion in historical and socio-reflexive contexts, on pre-theoretical foundations. The main modern trend in religious studies and quantitative methodology is the virtualization of reference religious communities. The first stage of this process corresponds with a real-reference approach to the definition of religiosity, viewing religiosity mostly in the field of the normative behavioral and mental manifestations and mainly in majoritarian confessions. The second stage is associated with transition, which manifests itself in the unification of religiosity criteria, as in formalized multidimensional scales measuring religiosity. The third stage should probably be associated with the emerging virtual reference approach, when a social subject is engaged in the reflexive construction of one’s religious identity, and a sociologist, on the contrary, shifts the research optics to identify the boundless diversity of its manifestations. This implies a retreat of the methodological category of the religiosity degree and any measured religiosity, a deconstruction of a priori models of the latter, reshaping an analysis into one based on unbiased description of religious manifestations in situational contexts.

1. Allport G.W., Ross J.M. 1967. Personal Religious Orientation and Prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 5 (4). P. 432-443.

2. Berger P.L. 1974. Modern Identity: Crisis and Continuity. The cultural drama: Modern identities and social ferment. Ed. W.S. Dillon. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. P. 158-181.

3. Davie G. 1990. Believing without Belonging: Is This the Future of Religion in Britain? Social Compass. № 37 (4). P. 455-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/003776890037004004

4. Davie G. 2004. New Approaches in the Sociology of Religion: A Western Perspective. Social Compass. № 53. P. 73-84.

5. Glock Ch.Y. 1962. On the Study of Religious Commitment. Religious Education, Research Supplement. Vol. 42. P. 99-100.

6. Lebedev S., Blagojević M., Pokaninova E. 2020. Value- and Reflection-based Approach to Indicators of Orthodox Religiosity of the Population. Stanovništvo. 58 (1). P. 47-61. Available at: http://idn.org.rs/ojs3/ stanovnistvo/index.php/STNV/article/view/381 (accessed 08.08.2020).

7. Lenski G. 1961. The Religious Factor: A Sociological Study of Religion’s Impact On Politics, Economics, And Family Life. New York, Doubleday: Garden City. 381 p.

8. Luckman T. 1999. Religion Situation in Europe: the Background to Contemporary Conversions. Social Compass. № 46 (3). P. 251-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/003776899046003002

9. Le Bras G. 1955-1956. Etudes de Sociologie Religieuse. Paris: Presses universitaires de France. 820 p. (In French).

10. Anderson B. 2016. Voobrazhaemye soobshchestva. Razmyshleniia ob istokakh i rasprostranenii natsionalizma [Imagined Communities Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism]. Moscow: Kuchkovo pole. 416 p. (In Russian).

11. Bella R.N. 1996. Osnovnye etapy evoliutsii religii v istorii obshchestva [The Main Stages of the Evolution of Religion in the History of Society]. Religiia i obshchestvo: Khrestomatiia po sotsiologii religii. Sost. V.I. Garadzha, E.D. Rutkevich. Moscow: Aspekt Press. P. 665-677 (In Russian).

12. Bogachev M.I. 2015. „A byl li mal’chik?“ Transformatsiia formy sviazi mezhdu votserkovlennost’iu i elektoral’nymi predpochteniiami pravoslavnykh veruiushchikh [„Was There a Boy or Not?“ The Form Transformation of the Link between Church Observance and Electoral Preferences of the Orthodox]. Nauchnyi rezul’tat. Seriia: Sotsiologiia i upravlenie. 1 (3). P. 1-23 (In Russian).

13. Bogachev M.I. 2016. K voprosu o formirovanii integral’nogo podkhoda k kontseptualizatsii religioznosti [On the Formation of an Integrated Approach to Conceptualizing the Religiousity]. Svet Khristov prosveshchaet vsekh: al’manakh Sviato-Filaretovskogo pravoslavno-khristianskogo instituta. № 18. P. 9-26 (In Russian).

14. Borisova O.N., Pavliutkin I.V. 2019. Variativnost’ modelei sovremennoi gorodskoi mnogodetnosti: vozrozhdenie traditsii, novye braki ili setevye effekty? [The Revival of Tradition, New Marriages or Network Effects: Variability of Models of Large Modern Urban Families]. Mir Rossii. № 4. P. 128-151 (In Russian).

15. Breskaia O.Iu. 2011. Izuchenie religioznosti: k neobkhodimosti integral’nogo podkhoda [Studying Religi-osity: on the Need for an Integral Approach]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia. № 12. P. 77-87 (In Russian).

16. Chernysh M.F. 2014. Setevaia sreda religioznykh iskanii [The Online Environment of Religious Quest]. Inter. № 7. P. 85-94 (In Russian).

17. Chesnokova V.F. 2005. Tesnym putem: Protsess votserkovleniia naseleniia Rossii v kontse XX v. [„Enter through the Narrow Gate“: The Process of Churching in Russia in Late 20th Century]. Moscow: Akademicheskii Proekt. 304 p. (In Russian).

18. Divisenko K.S., Belov A.E. 2017. Sotsial’nye issledovaniia sub”ektivnogo blagopoluchiia v kontekste dukhovnosti i religioznosti. [Social Studies of Subjective Well-Being in the Context of Spirituality and Religiousity]. Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal. 23 (2). P. 51-73 (In Russian).

19. Donati P. 2013. Sociologia relazionale. Come cambia la societa. Brescia: La Scuola. 368 p. (In Italian) (Russ. ed.: Donati P. 2019. Reliatsionnaia teoriia obshchestva: Sotsial’naia zhizn’ s tochki zreniia kriticheskogo realizma. Moscow: Izd-vo PSTGU. 312 p.).

20. Durkheim E. 1960. Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Le système totémique en Australie. Paris: Alcan. 647 p. (In French) (Russ. ed.: Durkheim E. 2018. Elementarnye formy religioznoi zhizni: totemicheskaia sistema v Avstralii. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom „Delo“ RANKhiGS. 736 p.).

21. Faulkner J.E., Jong, de. G.F. 1966. Religiosity in 5-D: An Empirical Analysis. Social Forces. 45 (2). P. 246-254 (Russ. ed.: Faulkner J.E., Jong, de. G.F. 2011. Religioznost’ v piati izmereniiakh: empiricheskii analiz. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia. № 12. P. 69-76.).

22. Filatov S.B., Lunkin R.N. 2005. Statistika rossiiskoi religioznosti: magiia tsifr i neodnoznachnaia real’nost’ [Statistics of Russian Religiousity: the Magic of Numbers and Unexpected Reality]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia. № 4. P. 35-45 (In Russian).

23. Giddens E. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 186 p. (Russ. ed.: Giddens E. 2011. Posledstviia sovremennosti. Moscow: Praksis. 752 p.).

24. Glagolev V.S. 2013. Germetichnost’ religii kak problema sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniia [Religion Her-meticity as a Problem of Sociological Research]. Sotsiologiia religii v obshchestve Pozdnego Moderna (pamiati Iu.Iu. Sinelinoi): materialy Tret’ei Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii. NIU „BelGU“, 13 sentiabria 2013 g. Otv. red. S.D. Lebedev. Belgorod: ID „Belgorod“. P. 77-86 (In Russian).

25. Grishaeva E.I. 2018. Religioznaia identichnost’ kak nezavershennyi proekt. Perspektivy primeneniia diskursivnykh podkhodov dlia sotsiologicheskogo izucheniia identichnosti v pravoslavnykh prikhodakh [Religious Identity as Unfinished Project. Prospects of Appying Discourse Approaches to Sociological Study of Identity in Orthodox Parishes]. Nauchnyi rezul’tat. Seriia: Sotsiologiia i upravlenie. 4 (1). P. 13-22 (In Russian).

26. Habermas J. 2001. Jürgen Habermas. Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur. Auf dem Weg zu einer liberalen Eugenik? and Jürgen Habermas. Glauben und Wissen. Bonn, gefördert: Suhrkamp Verlag. 164 s., 60 s. (In German) (Russ. ed.: Habermas J. 2002. Budushchee chelovecheskoi prirody. Na puti k liberal’noi evgenike? Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom „Ves’ mir“. 144 p.).

27. Hervieu-Léger D. 2006 In Search of Certainties: The Paradoxes of Religiosity in Societies of High Modernity. The Hedgehog Review. 8 (1-2). P. 59-68 (Russ. ed.: Hervieu-Léger D. 2015. V poiskakh opredelennosti: paradoksy religioznosti v obshchestvakh razvitogo moderna. Gosudarstvo, religiia, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom. № 1 (33). P. 254-268.).

28. Kargina I.G. 2014. Sotsiologicheskie refleksii sovremennogo religioznogo pliuralizma [Sociological Reflections of Contemporary Religious Pluralism]. Moscow: MGIMO–Universitet. 278 p. (In Russian).

29. Khlopkova O.V. 2020. Transformatsiia podkhodov k issledovaniiu religioznosti v sotsial’nykh naukakh [Transformation of Approaches to Religiosity Studies in Social Sciences]. Chelovek. Sotsium. Obshchestvo. № 2. P. 122-130 (In Russian).

30. Khuber Sh., Khuber O.V. 2018. Shkala tsentral’nosti religioznosti (CRS) [The Scale of Religiosity Centrality (CRS)]. Sotsiologiia: metodologiia, metody, matematicheskoe modelirovanie. № 47. P. 144-171 (In Russian).

31. Kostylev P.N. 2014. K kritike bazovykh poniatii sotsiologii religii: „religioznost’“ [Criticizing Basic Concepts of Sociology of Religion: „Religiosity“]. Sotsiologiia religii v obshchestve Pozdnego Moderna: sbornik statei po materialam IV Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii. Otv. red. S.D. Lebedev. Belgorod: Izdatel’skii dom „Belgorod“. P. 63-68 (In Russian).

32. Kublitskaia E.A. 2015. Razvitie protsessa desekuliarizatsii v regionakh Rossii (monitoringovye issledova-niia) [Development of the Desecularization Process in Russian Regions (Monitoring)]. Rossiia: tsentr i regiony. Vyp. 25. P. 153-175 (In Russian).

33. Lopatkin R.A. 1996. Sotsiologicheskoe izuchenie religioznoi situatsii i gosudarstvenno‒tserkovnykh ot-noshenii [Sociological Inquiry into the Situation in Religion and State‒Church Relations]. Gosudarstvenno-tserkovnye otnosheniia v Rossii: Opyt proshlogo i sovremennoe sostoianie. Otv. red. F.G. Ovsienko, M.I. Odintsov, N.A. Trofimchuk. Moscow: Izd-vo RAGS. P. 190-223 (In Russian).

34. Luhmann N. 2002. Einführung in die Systemtheorie. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer-Systeme Verlag. 347 s. (In German) (Russ. ed.: Luhmann N. 2007. Vvedenie v sistemnuiu teoriiu. Moscow: Logos. 360 p.).

35. Markin K.V. 2018. Mezhdu veroi i neveriem: nepraktikuiushchie pravoslavnye v kontekste rossiiskoi sotsiologii religii [Between Belief and Unbelief: Non-Practicing Orthodox Christians in the Context of the Russian Sociology of Religion]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny. № 2. P. 266-282 (In Russian).

36. Mchedlov M.P. 2005. Religiovedcheskie ocherki. Religiia v dukhovnoi i obshchestvenno-politicheskoi zhizni sovremennoi Rossii [Essays in Religion Studies. Religion in the Spiritual, Social and Political Life of Contemporary Russia]. Moscow: Nauchnaia kniga. 447 p. (In Russian).

37. Pismanik M.G. 2019. Religiia v kul’ture i v grazhdanskom edinenii [Religion in Culture and Civil Unity]. Perm: Perm. gos. in-t kul’tury. 444 p. (In Russian).

38. Prutskova E.V. 2012. Operatsionalizatsiia poniatiia „religioznost’“ v empiricheskikh issledovaniiakh [Op-erationalizing the Concept of „Religiosity“ in Empirical Studies]. Gosudarstvo, Religiia, Tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom. № 2 (30). P. 268-293 (In Russian).

39. Prutskova E.V. 2015. Sviaz’ religioznosti i tsennostno-normativnykh pokazatelei: faktor religioznoi sot-sializatsii [The Link between Religiosity and the Normative-Value Indices. The Factor of Religious Socialization]. Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriia 1: Bogoslovie. Filosofiia. № 3 (59). P. 62-80 (In Russian).

40. Rutkevich E.D. 2014. «Sotsiologiia dukhovnosti»: problemy stanovleniia. [„Sociology of Spirituality“: Problems of Development]. Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii RAN. № 2 (9). P. 36-65 (In Russian).

41. Silantieva M.V. 2013. Metod „vkliuchennogo nabliudeniia“ kak instrument issledovaniia religioznykh protsessov v sovremennoi Rossii. [The Method of „Participant observation“ as a Tool in Studies of Religious Processes in Contemporary Russia]. Sotsiologiia religii v obshchestve Pozdnego Moderna (pamiati Iu.Iu. Sinelinoi): materialy Tret’ei Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii. NIU „BelGU“, 13 sentiabria 2013 g. Otv. red. S.D. Lebedev. Belgorod: ID «Belgorod». P. 184-196 (In Russian).

42. Sinelina Iu.Iu. 2011. Tsikly sekuliarizatsii v istorii Rossii. Sotsiologicheskii analiz: konets XVII – nachalo XXI v. [Cycles of Secularization in Russian History. Sociological Analysis: Late 17th – Early 21st Centurites]. Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academia Publishing. 382 p. (In Russian).

43. Smirnov M.Iu. 2015. Vozmozhno li otkazat’sia ot kontsepta religioznosti pri issledovanii religii? [Is it Pos-sible to Abandon the Concept of Religiosity Religion Studies?]. Vestnik Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii. Vol. 16. № 2. P. 145-153. Available at: http://religjourn.ru/nauka/post-227/ (accessed 04.01.16) (In Russian).

44. Sukhorukov V.V. 2018. Tesnyi put’ okazalsia shirokim [The Narrow Gate Turned out to be Wide]. Sekuliarizatsiia v kontekste religioznykh izmenenii sovremennogo obshchestva. Ser. „Demografiia. Sotsiologiia. Ekonomika“. Pod red. S.Iu. Glaz’eva, S.V. Riazantseva, E.A. Kublitskoi. Moscow: Ekon-Inform. P. 144-154 (In Russian).

45. Taylor Ch. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 896 p. (Russ. ed.: Taylor Ch. 2017. Sekuliarnyi vek. Moscow: BBI. 997 p.).

46. Trofimov S.V. 2019. Svetskoe obshchestvo: mazhoritarnaia religiia v men’shinstve [Secular Society: Majority Religion in the Minority]. Sotsiologiia religii v obshchestve pozdnego moderna. T. 8. P. 69-76 (In Russian).

47. Zadorin I.V., Khomiakova A.P. 2019. Religioznaia samoidentifikatsiia respondentov v massovykh oprosakh: chto stoit za deklaratsiiami. [Religious Self-identification of Mass Survey Respondents: What is behind the Declared Religiosity?]. Politiia. №3 (94). P. 161-184 (In Russian).

48. Blagojević М. 2015. Vitalnost religije u (de)sekularizovanom društvu (desecularizacija srpskog i ruskog društva) [The Vitality of Religion in a (De)Secularized Society (Desecularization of Serbian and Russian Societies)]. Belgrade: Institut drustvenih nauka. 269 s. (In Serbian).