Cultural and Educational Environment in the Global Era: Heuristic Potential for Reaching Integrity

This paper outlines the main referent features of the culture‒education sphere in the framework of globalizing world order, viewed with the help of philosophical concepts, in particular, the heuristic. The relevance of the topic is determined by the problem of the transforming conditions of human life, which influence the formation of his personality as a result of civilizational changes in the globalizing world. The heterogeneity of the cultural space leads humanity to an awareness of the crisis and the search for non-standard solutions. The article sets the objective of revealing the possibilities whereby the education sector can influence the vector of civilizational developments, and of showing new perspectives of such a research. In following this, the study is based on the methodology of systems analysis, and on the interdisciplinary approach which is innovative in a sense that it highlights the heuristic nature of cognitive activity as a wide-format, conceptual solution of the central problem. The theoretical substantiation of the need to maintain the dynamic stability of the cultural and educational environment of Russia exposes the problem of the integrity of the national cultural and educational space. In this respect, the idea brought about is that heuristic can be applied as an analytical tool, balancing the vision on global and national civilizational processes. This can establish a stronger coherence of political and cultural bodies on the both levels mentioned, with heuristic foundation of sustainable development, public administration and governance. The results make it possible to single out a number of program documents of global importance that consolidate the concept of sustainable development as a priority for managing civilizational processes, contributing to the renewal of goal-setting and the formation of a new vision, a new way to treat the reality. The sustainable path that Russia took determines the tools for modeling the integrity of the cultural and educational space, based on the parameters of the balance of material needs, moral values, and ensures coordination of the goals of culture and education.

cultural and educational environment, interdisciplinarity, complexity, integrity, globalization, sustainable development, heuristic, synergistic approach, cultural parameters, cultural conformity, human capital, cultural policy

1. Astafyeva O.N. 2013. Dinamika sociokul’turnykh protsessov: nestabil’nost’ kak proiavlenie slozhnostnosti [Dynamics of Sociocultural Processes: Instability as a Sign of Complexity]. Vestnik Moskovskoi gosudarstvennoi akademii delovogo administrirovaniia. Seriia Filosofskie, sotsial’nye i estestvennye nauki. 1. Pp. 82-91. (In Russian).

2. Astafyeva O.N. 2019. Innovatsionnoe upravlenie v sfere kul’tury i kachestvo chelovecheskogo kapitala v usloviiakh sotsiokul’turnoi modernizatsii [Innovative Management of the Sphere of Culture and Quality of the Human Capital in the Conditions of Sociocultural Modernization]. Versatility of the Human Capital: Cultural and Social Bases. Moscow: Soglasie. Pp. 112-131. (In Russian).

3. Astafyeva O.N. 2011. Kollektivnaia identichnost’ v usloviiakh global’nykh izmenenii: dinamika ustoichivogo i ukorenenie stanoviashchegosia [Collective Identity in the Context of Global Changes: Dynamics of the Sustainable and the Rooting of the Emerging.]. Voprosy social’noj teorii. Vol. 5. Рp. 223-241. (In Russian).

4. Astafyeva O.N. 2012. Kul’tura kak samoorganizuiushchaiasia sistema: sinergeticheskaia kontseptsiia [Culture as a Self-organizing System: a Synergetic Concept]. Teoriia kul’tury: raznoobrazie podhodov i vozmozhnosti ikh integratsii. Kollektivnaia monografiia, pod red. Iu.M. Reznika. Moscow: Nauchno-politicheskaia kniga. Pp. 105-150. (In Russian).

5. Astafyeva O.N., Nikonorova E.V., Shlykova O.V. 2019. Social’no-gumanitarnye aspekty poniatiia “chelovecheskii capital”: vzaimosviaz’ “kul’turnogo kapitala” i “prirodnogo kapitala” [Social and Humanitarian Approaches to Judgment of the Integrative Concept (Human Capital): Interrelation of “Cultural Capital” and “Natural Capital”]. Versatility of the Human Capital: Cultural and Social Bases. Moscow: Soglasie. Pp. 33-47. (In Russian).

6. Astafyeva O.N., Shlykova O.V. 2019. Vvedenie. Kul’turno-obrazovatel’noe iadro chelovecheskogo kapitala: teorija, praktiki, opyt [Introduction. Cultural and Educational Core of Human Capital: Theory, Practice, Experience]. Versatility of the Human Capital: Cultural and Social Bases. Moscow: Soglasie. Pp. 13-23. (In Russian).

7. Astafyeva O.N. 2006. Teoriia samoorganizatsii kak konceptual’noe osnovanie kul’turnoi politiki: problemy teoreticheskoi kul’turologii [Theory of Self-organization as a Conceptual Basis of Cultural Policy: Problems Theoretical of Culturology]. Voprosy kulʹturologii. 12. Pp. 18-27. (In Russian).

8. Astafyeva O.N. 2009. Tselostnost’ kul’tury kak “edinstvo mnozhestvennosti” [Integrity of Culture as “United Plurality”]. Sinergeticheskaia paradigma. Sotsial’naia sinergetika. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiia. Pp.133-156. (In Russian).

9. Belozertsev E.P. 2009. Kul’turno-obrazovatel’naia sreda: metodologicheskaia neizbezhnost’ sovremennogo otechestvennogo pedagogicheskogo znaniia [Cultural and Educational Environment: Methodological Inevitability of Domestic Modern Pedagogical Knowledge]. Evrazijskij forum.1. Pp. 142-152. (In Russian).

10. Belozertsev E.P., Shcherbakova I.B. 2016. Kul’turno-obrazovatel’naia sreda provincii i zdorovyi obraz zhizni studenta (teoretiko-metodologicheskii aspekt) [Cultural and educational environment of the province and healthy lifestyle of the student (theoretical and methodological aspect)]. Voronezh: Tipografija im. I.A. Bolkhovitinova. 230 p. (In Russian).

11. Chumakov A.N. 2019. Filosofskoe izmerenie kul’turno-civilizatsionnogo razvitiia v usloviiakh mnogoaspektnoi globalizatsii [Philosophical Dimension of Cultural and Civilizational Development in the Context of Multi-aspect Globalization]. Mezhkul’turnoe vzaimodeistvie Rossii i Kitaia: global’noe i lokal’noe izmerenie. Moscow: Prospekt. Pp. 11-31. (In Russian).

12. Eagleton T. 2000. The Idea of Culture. 2012. Oxford. Wiley-Blackwell. 168 p. (Russ. ed.: Eagleton T. 2012. Ideia kul’tury. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki. 192 p.).

13. Grechko P.K. 2012. Paradigmal’naia evristika complexity v sovremennom sotsial’no-gumanitarnom poznanii [Paradigmatical Heuristics of Complexity in Humanities and Social Sciences]. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 1. Pp. 5-21. (In Russian).

14. Guskova N.D., Neretina E.A., Salimova T.A. 2015. Obrazovanie v kontekste kontseptsii ustoichivogo razvitiia [Education in interests the Context of the Sustainable Development in Russia: Problems and Calls]. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Humanities and Social Sciences. 1. Pp. 161-171. https:// doi.org/10.5862/jhss.215.21 (In Russian).

15. Ilyin I.V., Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. 2015. Novye global’nye celi ustojchivogo razvitija [New Global Goals of Sustainable Development]. Bulletin Moscow University. Series 27. Global Studies and Geopolitics. 3-4. Pp. 60-84. (In Russian).

16. Kipnes L.V. 2017. Sozdanie edinoi kul’turno-obrazovatel’noi sredy: iz opyta raboty ANO “Universitetskie obrazovatel’nye okruga” [The Creation of a Unified Cultural and Educational Environment: Experience of ANO “University Educational District”]. Vestnik of the Orenburg State University. 10. Pp. 78-82. (In Russian).

17. Murzina I.Ia. 2014. Regional’noe kul’turno-obrazovatel’noe prostranstvo: struktura, funktsii, sotsiokul’turnyj potentsial. Monografiia [Regional Cultural and Educational Space: Structure, Functions, Socio-cultural Potential]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Pero. 197 p. (In Russian).

18. Opolev P.V. 2019. Slozhnost’ kak antropokul’turnyi fenomen [Complexity as Anthropocultural Phenomenon]. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 3. Pp. 101-112. https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2019-3-11101-112 (In Russian).

19. Ostapenko S.M. 2019. Filosofskie aspekty v issledovaniiakh kul’turno-obrazovatel’noi sredy i ikh prikladnye proektsii v Natsional’nom proekte “Obrazovanie” [Philosophical Aspects in the Research of the Cultural and Educational Environment and their Applied Projections in the National Project “Education”]. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie i razvitie Rossii: natsional’nye tseli i instituty. Sbornik statei mezhdunarodnoi konferentssessii. Tom 1. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom Nauchnaia biblioteka. Pp. 431-442. (In Russian).

20. Ostapenko S.M. 2020. “Krymskie sezony iskusstv”: regional’nyi opyt proektirovaniia i praktika formirovaniia kul’turno-obrazovatel’noi sredy [“Crimean Art Seasons”: Regional Design Experience and Practice of Creating Cultural and Educational Environment]. “Dialogi o kul’ture i iskusstve”: materialy IX Vserossiiskoi nauchnoprakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem (Perm’, 17-19 okt. 2019 g.). V 2 ch.: ch. 2, Pp. 144-152. (In Russian).

21. Pasenov A.N. 2017. Kontseptsiia ustoichivogo razvitiia: istoriko-pravovye aspekty [The Concept of Sustainable Development: Historical and Legal Aspects]. Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin. Philosophy Sociology Law. 10. Pp. 156-160. (In Russian).

22. Shugurov M.V. 2013. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye osnovaniia perehoda k ustoichivomu razvitiiu [International Legal Foundation for Transition to Sustainable Development]. Vestnik Saratovskoj gosudarstvennoj ûridičeskoj akademii. 2. Pp. 161-180. (In Russian).

23. Silantyeva M.V., Shestopal A.V. 2017. Antropologicheskie i tsennostnye osnovaniia kommunikatsii: teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty [Communication Anthropological and Value Basics: Theoretical and Practical Aspects]. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 1. Pp. 11-23. (In Russian).

24. Stoianovskaia I.B. 2015. Kul’turno-obrazovatel’naia sreda kak istochnik razvitiia tvorcheskogo potentsiala lichnosti [Cultural and Educational Environment as a Source of Development of Personal Creative Potential]. Novaâ nauka. 4. Pp. 44-47. (In Russian).

25. Svirskiy Ya.Jo. 2012. Slozhnostnoe myshlenie v kontekste filosofskikh strategii Zh. Deleza i F. Gvattari [Thinking in Complexity: Philosophical Strategies of Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari]. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 1. Pp. 37-47. (In Russian).

26. Ursul A.D. 2016. Stanovlenie ustoichivoi tsivilizatsii: novye global’nye tseli [Building a Sustainable Civilization: New Global Goals]. Philosophy and Society. 1. P. 29-56. (In Russian).

27. Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. 2016. Tseli perekhoda k ustoichivomu razvitiiu chelovecheskoi tsivilizatsii [The Goals of Human Civilization`s Transition to Sustainable Development]. Knowledge. Understanding. Skil 2. Pp. 65-72. https://doi.org/10.17805/zpu.2016.2.6 (In Russian).

28. Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. 2017. Fenomen futurizatsii v obrazovanii dlia ustoichivogo razvitiia [Phenomenon of Futurization in Education for Sustainable Development]. Tsennosti i smysly. 6. Pp. 8–20. (In Russian).

29. Volchek E.Z. 1997. Evristichnost’ poznavatel’nogo deistviia [Heuristic of the Knowledge Action]. Vesnìk Belaruskaga dzâržaŭnaga èkanamičnaga unìversìtèta. 3. Pp. 80-87. (In Russian).