Preview

Concept: philosophy, religion, culture

Advanced search

Religious and Ethical Issues of Artificial Intelligence: Expert Assessments and the Vatican Position

https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-4-16-68-82

Abstract

The paper is dedicated to the emergence of progressive artificial intelligence technologies and its relations to the human nature and soul, as viewed by experts and in such specific community as the church. We seem now to be entering a new phase of the comprehension of the moral aspects of the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) into the life of different societies. The romantic period of high expectations and excessive anxiety is replaced by the growing understanding of the complexity of the man‒machine interaction, which implies the intersection moral, legal, political and utilitarian dimensions of both a person and an artifact. The problematic issues are now more obvious, clear and difficult, as the disciplinary boundaries are revealed and highlighted. Among the crucial issues one should mention deficiencies in definitions; weakness of research optics and the vision that would be friendly to other areas of study or practice. This also includes the issues of integral assessment of the existing dangers, difficulties in describing the mechanisms of fulfilling both ethical and technically viable requirements. As scientific knowledge accumulates, both the benefits of introducing AI technologies into everyday life and previously underestimated new threats become more obvious. These societal and humanitarian ones include, in particular, social turbulence, neuroticism, digital crimes and crimes associated freedom abuses and losses of identity. Over the past few years, state and non-governmental institutions have proposed different approaches to determining what is included in the moral core of the problem under consideration. The efforts of many, if not most, of them turn out to be compromised by suspicions in willful intents. In this context, the broad consensus with the key agent facilitators is required, and the role such actors play in providing social stability is indisputable. One of the key roles in offering society the broadest vision on the anthropocentric development and AI progress belongs to the Roman Catholic Church. The Vatican’s quest to unite philosophers, AI developers, and religious leaders to address the ethical challenges of designing and implementing robotics is becoming an important element of the Christian witness in a world that is consider ed irrevocably secularized by many.

About the Author

A. A. Abramov
Sretenskaya Theological Seminary
Russian Federation

Alexander A. Abramov — Senior Lecturer

107031, Moscow, Bolshaya Lubyanka Str., 19, Bldg. 3



References

1. Caldwell M., Andrews J.T.A., Tanay T. 2020. AI-enabled Future Crime. Crime Science. 9 (1). 14 p. https://doi. org/10.1186/s40163-020-00123-8

2. I Papi e la Pontificia Accademia per la Vita. The Popes and the Pontifical Academy for Life. 2020. Citta del Vaticano: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 240 p.

3. Kamps J., Kleinberg B. 2018. To the Moon: Defining and Detecting Cryptocurrency Pump-and-dumps. Crime Science. 7(1). 18 p. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-018-0093-5

4. Legg S., Hutter M. 2007. A Collection of Definitions of Intelligence. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. Vol. 157. Pp. 17-24.

5. Robo-Ethics. Humans, Machines and Health. Proceedings of the XXV General Assembly of Members. 2020. Rome: Pontifical Academy for Life. 301 p.

6. Shelledy R.B. 2004. The Vatican’s Role in Global Politics. SAIS Review. 24(2). Pp.149-162. https://doi. org/10.1353/sais.2004.0044

7. Troy J. 2018. “The Pope’s Own Hand Outstretched”: Holy See Diplomacy as a Hybrid Mode of Diplomatic Agency. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. Vol. 20 (3), Pp. 521-539. https://doi. org/10.1177%2F1369148118772247

8. Vukićević B. 2015. Pope Francis and the Challenges of Inter-civilization Diplomacy. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional. 58(2). Pp. 65-79.

9. Wagen W., Pieters W. 2015. From Cybercrime to Cyborg Crime: Botnets as Hybrid Criminal Actor-Networks. British Journal of Criminology. 55(3). Pp. 578-595. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azv009

10. Wilner A.S. 2018. Cybersecurity and its discontents: Artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, and digital misinformation. International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis. 73(2). Pp. 308-316. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0020702018782496

11. Joubert B. 2017. La diplomatie du Saint-Siège. Pouvoirs. 162(3). Pp. 47-61. https://doi.org/10.3917/ pouv.162.0047 (In French).

12. Barrat J. 2013. Our Final Invention. Artificial Intelligence and the End of the Human Era. New York: Thomas Dunne Books. 322 p. (Russ. ed.: Barrat J. 2019. Poslednee izobretenie chelovechestva. Iskusstvennyi intellekt i konets ery Homo Sapiens. Moscow: Al’pina non-fikshn. 396 p.).

13. Broussard M. 2018. Artificial Unintelligence. How Computers Misunderstand the World. Cambridge, London: MIT Press. 248 p. (Russ. ed.: Broussard M. 2020. Iskusstvennyi intellekt. Predely vozmozhnogo. Moscow: Al’pina non-fikshn. 362 p.).

14. Dereshko B.Iu. 2018. Ogranichenie smertonosnykh avtonomnykh sistem vooruzhenii: initsiativa dopolnit’ Konventsiiu OON o «negumannom» oruzhii. [Limiting Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems: An Initiative to Supplement the UN Convention on Non-Human Weapons]. Vestnik voennogo prava. 1. Pp. 86-87. (In Russian).

15. Ford M. 2018. Architects of Intelligence: The Truth about AI from the People Building It. Birmingham: Packt Publishing. 554 p. (Russ ed.: Ford M. 2020. Arkhitektory intellekta: vsia pravda ob iskusstvennom intellekte ot ego sozdatelei. Saint-Petersburg: Piter. 416 p.).

16. Ioann Pavel II. 2003. Sochineniia. Tom 2. Per. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo frantsiskantsev. 480 p. (In Russian).

17. «Kto stuchitsia v dver’ moia! Vidish’, doma net nikto». Iskusstvennyi intellekt na sluzhbe u intellekta estestvennogo. 2016. [Who is Knocking my Door? There’s Nobody ‘Ere. Artificial Intelligence Serving the Human Intellect]. Nikitskii klub. Tsikl publichnykh diskussii «Rossiia v global’nom kontekste». Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Nikitskogo kluba. Vypusk 81. Pp. 30-33 (In Russian).

18. Nestik T.A. 2018. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie prediktory otnosheniia lichnosti k iskusstvennomu intellektu i robotizatsii [Socio-psychological Predictors of Person’s Attitude towards Artificial Intelligence and Robotisation]. Sotsial’naia i ekonomicheskaia psikhologiia. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Seriia «Trudy instituta psikhologii RAN». Eds. Iu.V.Kovaleva, T.A.Nestik. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Instituta psikhologii RAN. Pp. 406-428 (In Russian).

19. Nestik T.A. 2019a. Iskusstvennyi intellekt kak kognitivnyi protez. Transformatsiia obrazov budushchego. [Artificial Intelligence as Cognitive Prosthesis or Mediator: Transormation of Imaginated Futures]. Educational policy. 4. Pp. 104-117 (In Russian).

20. Nestik T.A. 2019b. Perspektivy psikhologicheskikh issledovanii vnedreniia tekhnologii iskusstvennogo intellekta [Perspectives of Psychological Studies of AI Technologies Use]. Tsifrovoe obshchestvo v kul’turnoistoricheskoi paradigme. Kollektivnaia monografiia. Eds. T.D. Martsinkovskoi, V.R. Orestovoi, O.V. Gavrichenko. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo pedagogicheskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pp.13-22 (In Russian).

21. Nestik T.A. 2019c. Posledstviia vnedreniia iskusstvennogo intellekta i robototekhnicheskikh sistem v povsednevnuiu zhizn’: perspektivy psikhologicheskikh issledovanii [AI and Robotic Systems Use and Their Impact on Day-To-Day Life: Perspective for Psychological Studies]. Sub’’ekt truda i organizatsionnaia sreda: problemy vzaimodeistviia v usloviiakh globalizatsii: Kollektivnaia monografiia. A.L. Zhuravlev, T.A. Zhalagina i dr. Tver’: Izdatel’stvo Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pp. 218-228 (In Russian).

22. Nestik T.A., Zhuravlev A.L. 2018. Psikhologiia global’nykh riskov [Psychology of Global Risks]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Instituta psikhologii RAN. 402 p. (In Russian).

23. Papa Rimskij Francisk. 2015. Jenciklika o zabote ob obshhem dome. Laudato si’ [Encyclical Letter Laudato Si’ of the Pope Francis on Care for Our Common Home]. Per. Moscow: NO Izdatel’stvo franciskancev. Pp. 70-79 (In Russian).

24. Proydakov E.M. 2018. Sovremennoe sostojanie iskusstvennogo intellekta. [Current state of artificial intelligence]. Studies in Science. Pp. 129-153. https://doi.org/10.31249/scis/2018.00.09 (In Russian).

25. Razin A.V. 2018. Iskusstvennyj intellekt i svoboda voli [Artificial Intelligence and Free Agency]. Iskusstvennyj intellekt: jeticheskie problemy «cifrovogo obshhestva». Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Ed. V.O. Sheleketa. Belgorod: Izdatel’stvo Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnologicheskogo universiteta im. V.G. Shuhova. P. 110-119 (In Russian).

26. Schwab K. 2016. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum, Cologny. 192 p. (Russ. ed.: Schwab K. 2019. Chetvertaia promyshlennaia revoliutsiia. Moscow: Eksmo. 209 p).

27. Schwab K., Davis N. 2018. Shaping the Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum, Cologny. 287 p. (Russ. ed.: Schwab K., Davis N. 2019. Tekhnologii Chetvertoi promyshlennoi revoliutsii. Moscow: Eksmo. 320 p.).

28. Shibaeva K.N., Kholova L.N. 2018. Tri zakona robototekhniki Aizeka Azimova: k voprosu gumannosti primeneniia smertonosnykh avtonomnykh sistem vooruzheniia na voine [Three Laws of Isaac Asimov’s Robotics: on the Question of Humanities of the Application of Lethal Autonomous Weapons (Laws) in War]. Theology. Philosophy. Law. 4. Pp. 28-41. http://theophil.ru/index.php/journal/article/view/92 (In Russian).

29. Skuratova A.Yu, Korolkova E.E. 2019. Smertonosnye avtonomnye sistemy vooruzhenii: problemy mezhdunarodno-pravovogo regulirovaniia [Lethal Autonomous Weapons and the Problems of International Legal Regulation]. Russian Juridical Journal. 1. Pp. 22-30 (In Russian).

30. Ulanova A.E. 2020. Problema avtorstva i osobennosti chelovecheskogo vosprijatija (o tvorchestve iskusstvennyh nejronnyh setej) [The Problem of Authorship and Features of Human Perception (about the Creativity of Artificial Neural Networks]. Context and Reflection: Philosophy of the World and Human Being. 9 (1-1). Pp. 115-121. https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2020.47.1.036 (In Russian).

31. Zhuravlev A.L., Nestik T.A. 2020. Vozdeistvie novykh tekhnologii na lichnost’ i obshchestvo: perspektivy psikhologicheskikh issledovanii [New Technologies, Person and Society: Perspectives for Psychological Syudies]. Mifologiia veka NTR: utopii, mify, nadezhdy i real’nost’ noveishikh napravlenii nauki. Ot Frankenshteina i eliksira bessmertiia do «biokiborgov» i «postcheloveka». Moscow: Izdatel’stvo «Lenand». P. 113-132 (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Abramov A.A. Religious and Ethical Issues of Artificial Intelligence: Expert Assessments and the Vatican Position. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2020;4(4):68-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-4-16-68-82

Views: 1849


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-8831 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0540 (Online)