The Concept of Taste in South Korea: Historical, Aesthetical and Philosophical Aspects
https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-4-16-83-101
Abstract
The focus of this paper is on the Korean aesthetic model of taste. In order to investigate the origins of aesthetics in Korea and its current place in Koreans’ lives, it analyzes the key concepts of the Korean aesthetics and spiritual aspects of life for Koreans. In a way to exemplify this cultural system, traditional Korean food is presented as a conceptual representation of the aesthetic experience. Its role in integrating different aspects of meanings and values in everyday lives of Koreans is also discussed. The research subject is studied through the complex lenses: its association with both the gastronomic taste, which comprises organoleptic perception and aesthetic judgements, and the semiotic aspect of culture, represented by basic units thereof – words. The optics of the interdisciplinary outlook of this method suggests a new approach to viewing Korean aesthetic of taste. The research shows that scientific approach to aesthetics was first adopted in Korea in the 1930s under the cospicuous cultural influence of the Japanese colonial rule; the ideas formed at that time still remain important aesthetic concepts. The study proposes that meot should be viewed as the most important and representative concept in Koreans’ everyday aesthetic experience. The cultural and historical analysis of Korean gastronomic culture suggests there is a number of specific cultural and cosmogonic meanings that were typical of the royal cuisine during the Joseon era and demonstrates how certain Korean dishes are endowed with aesthetic and existential values today.
About the Author
T. V. Zimenko
MGIMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana V. Zimenko — Master of Mass Communication, Lecturer, Department of Japanese, Korean, Indonesian and Mongolian Languages
119454, Moscow, prospect Vernadskogo, 76
References
1. Barthes R. 2008. Toward a Psychosociology of Contemporary Food Consumption. Food and Culture: A Reader. 2nd edition. New York: Routledge. Pp. 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/03670240802577408
2. Bo Y., Soo J. 2001. A Study on the Traditional Aesthetic Consciousness Reflected on the Contemporary Fashion – Focused on Comparative Research for Korea and Japan. Journal of Fashion Business. 5 (4). Pp. 56-72.
3. Boulesteix F. 2010. The Aesthetics of the Plural Korean Essence. Asian Aesthetics. Singapore: NUS Press in Association with Kyoto University Press. Pp. 85-102.
4. Brady E. 2005. Sniffing and Savoring: The Aesthetics of Smells and Tastes. The Aesthetics of Everyday Life. New York: Columbia University Press. Pp. 177-194.
5. Brady E. 2012. Smells, Tastes, and Everyday Aesthetics. The Philosophy of Food. Berkeley: University of California Press. Pp. 69-86.
6. Breen M. 2004. The Koreans: Who They Are, What They Want, Where Their Future Lies. New York: Thomas Dunne Books. 304 p.
7. Chapple-Sokol S. 2013. Culinary Diplomacy: Breaking Bread to Win Hearts and Minds. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy. 8(2). Pp. 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-12341244
8. Choi J. 2011. Haehak. Korean Beauty. Seoul: Korean Culture and Information Service Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. Pp. 161-192.
9. Heyman A.C. 1990. The Psyche and Unique Character of Korean Dance. Korea Journal. 30 (11). P. 61-68. Hong K. 2011. Aesthetic Constructions of Korean Nationalism: Spectacle, Politics and History. New York: Routledge. 164 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203816042
10. Kaplan D. 2012. The Philosophy of Food. Berkeley: University of California Press. 320 p.
11. Kikuchi Y. 1994. Yanagi Sōetsu and Korean Crafts within the Mingei Movement. The British Association for Korean Studies (BAKS) Papers Series (now European Journal of Korean Studies). 5. Pp. 23-38.
12. Kim K.M. 1998a. Korean Aesthetic Consciousness and the Problem of Aesthetic Rationality. Canadian Aesthetics Journal. Vol. 2. http://web.archive.org/web/20070826195722/http://www.uqtr.ca/AE/vol_2/kim.html
13. Kim K.M. 2013. The Aesthetic Turn in Everyday Life in Korea. Open Journal of Philosophy. 3 (3). P. 359-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2013.33054
14. Kim S. 2017. Korean Han and the Postcolonial Afterlives of “The Beauty of Sorrow”. Korean Studies University of Hawai’i Press. Vol. 41. P. 253-279. https://doi.org/10.1353/ks.2017.0026
15. Kim Y. 2005. 20th Century Korean Art. London: Laurence King Publishing. 283 p.
16. Kim Y.-J. 2008. Korea’s Traditional Beauty. Philosophy. Thought. Culture. Vol. 7. P. 1-27.
17. King M.T. (ed.). 2019. Culinary Nationalism in Asia. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. 304 p.
18. Kwon Y. 2007. “The Aesthetic” in Traditional Korean Art and Its Influence on Modern Life. Korea Journal. 47 (3). Pp. 9-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.25024/kj.2007.47.3.9
19. Kwon Y., Lee H. 2015. Traditional Aesthetic Characteristics Traced in South Korean Contemporary Fashion Practice. The Journal of Design, Creative Process & the Fashion Industry. Vol. 7. Issue 2. Pp. 153-174. https://doi. org/10.1080/17569370.2015.1045348
20. Lee S., Nornes A.M. 2015. Hallyu 2.0: The Korean Wave in the Age of Social Media. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 268 p. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.7651262
21. McBride R.D. II. 2010. Silla Buddhism and the Hwarang. Korean Studies. Vol. 34. P. 54-89.
22. McCune E. 1962. The Arts of Korea. Clarendon: Tuttle Co. 452 p.
23. Min J. 1999. The Aesthetic Way of Life in East Asian Culture. Filozofski Vestnik Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Aethetics. Vol. 20 No. 2. Aesthetics as Philosophy, Part II. Liubljana. P. 131-140.
24. Perullo N. 2016. Taste as Experience: The Philosophy and Aesthetics of Food (Arts and Traditions of the Table: Perspectives on Culinary History). New York: Columbia University Press. 176 p.
25. Pettid M.J. 2014. Science, Food and Health in Chosǒn Korea. The Routledge History of Food. London: Routledge. P. 61-68. https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315753454.ch4
26. Saito Y. 2008. Everyday Aesthetics. Oxford: OUP Oxford. 292 p. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:o so/9780199278350.001.0001
27. Sweeney K.W. 2017. The Aesthetics of Food: The Philosophical Debate about What We Eat and Drink. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. 212 p.
28. The Essence of Japanese Cuisine: An Essay on Food and Culture. 2013. Eds. Ashkenazi M., Jacob J. et al. London: Routledge. 282 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315027487
29. Yang J.W., Lee M.S. 2013. Aesthetic Characteristics of the Stage Makeup of Korea, China and Japan’s Traditional Plays: From a Basic Conceptual Perspective of Buddhist Aesthetics. Journal of the Korean Society of Design Culture. 19 (2). P. 223-237.
30. Zhang J. 2015. The Foods of the Worlds: Mapping and Comparing Contemporary Gastrodiplomacy Campaigns. International Journal of Communication. No. 9. P. 568-591.
31. Eckardt A. 2003. Eckardt-ui joseon misulsa [History of the Joseon Dynasty Art]. Seoul: Yeolhwadang. 392 p. (In Korean).
32. Joo Y. 2011. Humanistic Study of Food: Korean History and Culture View Through its Food [Eumsik inmunhak: eumsig-euro bon hangug-ui yeoksa-wa munhwa]. Seoul: Hyumoniseuteu. 559 p. (In Korean).
33. Kim O. 2006. Hangug yeongeuk-ron bunyeol-gwa saengseong-ui moksori [The Split and the Birth of Korean Theater Theory]. Seoul: Yeongeuk-gwa Ingan. 278 p. (In Korean).
34. Kim S. 2007. Hangukmi-ui beomju-roseoui “meot”. [“Mut” as a Category of Korean Aesthetics]. Minjok Mihak [National Anesthetics]. Vol. 6. P. 7-31 (In Korean).
35. Kim Y. 1998b. Hangugin-ui gijil-gwa seonghyang-eul tonghae bon hangugmi-ui ihae [Understanding Korean Beauty through the Character and Inclinations of Korean people]. Seoul: Ewha Women’s University Press [Ihwa yeoja daehakgyo chulpanbu]. 341 p. (In Korean).
36. Ko Y. 2007. Joseon Misulsa-sang [History of Korean Art during the Joseon dynasty. Volume 1]. Seoul: Yeolhwadang. 440 p. (In Korean).
37. Lee J. 2014. Hangungmi-ui goyuseong gyumyeong-eul wihan bigyomihakjeok gochal [A study in comparative aesthetics for an investigation into the peculiarities of Korean beauty]. Journal of Korean Aesthetics and Science of Art [Hangungmihagyesulhakoeji]. Vol. 41. P. 103-151 (In Korean).
38. Lim S. 2015. Hangukmihagui eojenda (agenda)-e gwanhan gochal [Study on the Agenda of Korean Aesthetics]. Korean Aesthetics. 14 (1). P. 45-74 (In Korean).
39. Tsoi I.V. 2016. Pak Kionni. O poniatii mot [Park Kyungni. About the Concept of Mot.]. Koreiskii poluostrov v epokhu peremen. Moscow: Federal’noe gosudarstvennoe biudzhetnoe uchrezhdenie nauki Institut Dal’nego Vostoka Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. P. 357-368 (In Russian).
40. Heidegger M. 1977. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. 437 s. (In German). (Russ. ed.: Heidegger M. 1993. Vremia i bytie: stat’i i vystupleniia. Per. s nem. Moscow: Respublika. 447 p.).
41. Kim G.N. 2001. Istoriia religii Korei [History of Religion in Korea]. Almaty: Kazak Universiteti. 230 p. (In Russian).
42. Kurbatova L.V. 2013. Metafizika edy [Metaphysics of Food]. Vestnik Permskogo nacionalʹnogo issledovatelʹskogo politehničeskogo universiteta. Kulʹtura, istoriâ, filosofiâ, pravo. 7. P. 91-98 (In Russian).
43. Kuznecova A.G. 2013. Institut korolevskoi kukhni v epokhu Choson (1392-1897) [Institute of Royal Cuisine in the Times of Joseon (1392-1897)]. Proceedings of the Center for Korean Language and Culture. 15. Pp. 326350 (In Russian).
44. Kwon J. 2016. Mir koreiskoi emotsional’nosti kak psikhologicheskii istochnik natsional’noi teatral’noi kul’tury [The Universe of the Korean Emotionality as a Psychological Source of the National Theatrical Culture]. Kulʹturnaâ žiznʹ Ûga Rossii. 2. Pp. 109-114 (In Russian).
45. Mihailova M.V. 2008. Puteshestvie po kukhne [Kitchen Journey]. Vestnik Samarskoj gumanitarnoj akademii. Seriâ: Filosofiâ, filologiâ. 1. Pp. 105-108 (In Russian).
46. Osetrova M.E. 2014. Natsional’naia kukhnia i koreiskii natsionalizm [National Cuisine and Korean Nationalism]. Rossiia i Koreia v meniaiushchemsia mire: sbornik statei. Moscow: IDV RAN. P. 252-264 (In Russian).
47. Osetrova M.E. 2019. Sinsollo — pishcha vanov i sviatykh otshel’nikov. [Sinsollo — Food of the Kings and Hermit Saints]. Tam, gde tsvetet mugunkhva i raspuskaetsia sakura. Slovo ob uchionom. Kazan: Buk. P. 216-219 (In Russian).
48. Panova O.B. 2014. Vostok — Zapad: glubokie korni obshhnosti kul’turnykh mirov i integratsionnye tendentsii sovremennosti (opyt interpretatsii raboty M. Haideggera “Iz dialoga o iazyke mezhdu iapontsem i sprashivaiushchim”) [The Deep Roots of Community of the Cultural Worlds and the Integration Trends of Modernity (the Experience of the Interpretation of Heidegger’s “From the Dialogue about Language between a Japanese and an Asking Person”)]. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. 40(2). Pp. 184-201 (In Russian).
49. Pavlovskaya A.V. 2015. Gastrosofiia: nauka o ede. K postanovke problemy. Chast’ 1 [Gastrosophia: The Science of Food. Formulation of the Problem. PART 1. Part 1.]. The Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 19. Linguistics and Cross-Cultural Communication. 4. Pp. 23-38 (In Russian).
50. Vishnyakova O.D. 2015. Iazykovoi znak v referentsial’nom pole kul’turnoi pamiati sotsiuma. [The Language Sign in the Referential Field of the Cultural Memory of Society]. The Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 19. Linguistics and Cross-Cultural Communication. 4. Pp. 50-65 (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Zimenko T.V. The Concept of Taste in South Korea: Historical, Aesthetical and Philosophical Aspects. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2020;4(4):83-101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-4-16-83-101
Views:
1161
Email this article 