Preview

Concept: philosophy, religion, culture

Advanced search

Inherent Features and the Root Process of the Screen Text as the Audio- Visual Simulation of Reality

https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-4-16-46-56

Abstract

The article touches upon the issue of functions and features of screen text. Being generally a form of text, being expressed, semiotically separated and structured, screen text follows the same lines of general and linguistic semiotics as average texts. However, it is a multicomponent system. Among its characteristics it is possible to distinguish heterogeneity and polysemy that render it the audio-visual reflection, or rather simulation of reality. This article is a case study of a specific type of texts which are called polycode-polymodal. Logical and descriptive methods as well as observation, generalization, interpretation are the foundation of analyzing heterogeneous screen texts such as film texts, television texts and video texts of the Internet. On the exempl of various texts of visual arts and media the root process of text as specific mechanisms of framing the language used and, thus, the images and the meaning. Fundamental characteristics of the screen text – openness, psychological and aesthetic stimuli – are illustrated in descriptions of the root process. The paper contributes to revealing that the screen text obtains such features as heterogeneity, hierarchy, and polysemy, deriving from the root process of the screen text. Heterogeneity of the screen text directly influences its polysemy and makes screen text an open system. Polysemy, experience and likelihood, then, belong to the psychological stimulus; affectability, suggestive potential, suggestive infusion belong to the aesthetic stimulus. In turn, psychological and aesthetic stimuli are manifested in the screen text. Study of the root process and peculiarities of the screen text helps describe the schemes of constructing the secondary reality and simulacra on the screen, and also helps list the means of manipulation with the consciousness of the viewer in more detail.

About the Authors

O. L. Maksimenko
Moscow Region State University
Russian Federation

Olga I. Maksimenko — Doctor of Sciences in Philology (Linguistics), Full professor, Professor of the Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics

141014, Mytyshi, Very Voloshinoy str, 24



Y. A. Evgrafova
Moscow Region State University
Russian Federation

Yulia A. Evgrafova — PhD in Philology (Linguistics), Associate Professor of the Department of Indo-European and Oriental Languages

141014, Mytyshi, Very Voloshinoy str, 24



References

1. Borshhevskij I.S. 2019. Opisanie vstupitel’nyh titrov v audiodeskripcii (tiflokommentirovanii) [Setting out Opening Credit Sequences in Audio Descripion]. Filologija i lingvistika. 1. Pp. 37-41 (In Russian).

2. Golderova I.V., Kuzmina L.A. 2019. Biograficheskij portretnyj ocherk v jekrannoj kul’ture (na materiale nacional’no-veshhatel’noj kompanii «Saha») [Biographical Portrait Essay in Screen Culture: the Case of the Sakha National Broadcasting Company]. Bulletin of Northeast federal university of M. K. Ammosov. Series: Economy. Sociology. Cultural science. 4. Pp. 43-52 https://doi.org/10.25587/SVFU.2020.16.4.004 (In Russian).

3. Goroshko E.I. 2016. Novye tendencii v razvitii internet-lingvistiki: obshhenie ot klaviatury (zvuka) k jekranu (zvuku) [New Trends in Internet-Linguistics or Keyboard (Voice) to Screen (Voice) Communication)]. Verhnevolzhskij philological bulletin. 4. Pp. 148-153 (In Russian).

4. Evgrafova Yu.A. 2019. «Jazyk» jekrannosti i jekrannaja «rech’» v statike geterogennyh tekstov: diskretnye edinicy kontinuuma dvizhenija [Screen “Language” and Screen “Speech” in the Static Scope of Heterogeneous Texts: Discrete Units of the Movement Continuum]. Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University. 2. Pp. 156-170 https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2019-2-954 (In Russian)

5. Kolmogorov A.N. 1964. Zhizn’ i myshlenie kak osobye formy sushhestvovanija materii [Life and Mind as Distinct Forms of the Existence of Matter]. O sushhnosti zhizni. Moscow: Nauka. P. 48-57 (In Russian).

6. Kondakov I.V. 2014. Tekst jekrannyj i «knizhnyj»: glubina interpretacii [Screen Text and Book Text: The Depth of Interpretation]. Nauka televidenija. Vol. 11. Pp. 191-196 (In Russian).

7. Korchagin S.S. 2017. Problema izuchenija sushhnosti vizual’nogo vosprijatija ekrannogo teksta v teleseriale «Sherlok» s pozicii ajtrekinga [Eye Tracking Study of On-screen Text`s Visual Perception in “Sherlock” Television Series]. Culture and Civilization. 7 (6A). Pp. 397-404 (In Russian).

8. Korchagin S.S. 2017. Translatologicheskie osobennosti perevoda i lokalizacii jekrannyh tekstov v teleseriale «Sherlok» [Specific Localization of On-screen Texts in the original Sherlock Television Series and its Russian Translations]. Culture and Civilization. 7 (3A). Pp. 77-86 (In Russian).

9. Kostomarov V.G. 2019. O displejnyh tekstah [Display Text]. Russian Language Abroad. 1. Pp. 61-64 (In Russian).

10. Lotman Yu.M. 2005. Semiotika kino i problemy kinojestetiki [Semiotics of the Cinema and Problems of Film Aesthetics]. Ob iskusstve. Saint-Petersburg: «Iskusstvo – SPb». Pp. 288-372 (In Russian).

11. Luschinskaya O.V. 2019. Mediatekst konvergentnyh sredstv mas sovoj kommunikacii v kontekste diskursa [ Media Text of Convergent Mass Media in the Context of Discourse]. Žurnal Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Žurnalistika, pedagogika. 2. Pp. 32-39 (In Russian).

12. Morozov S.A. 2016. Vizualizacija teksta na displee [Visualization of the Text on the Display]. Kulʹtura i vremâ peremen. 1. http://timekguki.esrae.ru/28-164 (In Russian).

13. Nikulova G.A. 2017. Metadizajn jekrannogo teksta kak instrument avtorskoj kommunikacii [Metadesign of Screen Text as an Instrument of the Author Communication]. Meteor-Siti. 1. Pp. 11-17 (In Russian).

14. Romakina M.A. 2020. Mul’timedijnye «prostejshie»: sinemagrafija v smi i blogah 2010-h gg [“Elementary Units” in Multimedia: Cinemagraphy in Mass Media and Blogs шт the 2010s]. Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism. 9 (2). Pp. 247-263. https://doi.org/10.17150/2308-6203.2020.9(2).247-263 (In Russian).

15. Severina E.M. 2019. Cifrovoj tekst v prostranstve sovremennoj kul’tury [Digital Text in the Context of Modern Culture]. Man and Culture. 5. Pp. 65-72. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8744.2019.5.30967 (In Russian)

16. Stakhorsky S. 2019. Narrativy teatral’noj dramaturgii i ih jekrannye otrazhenija (diegezis i jekfrasis) [Narratives of Drama and its On-screen Reflections (Diegesis and Ecphrasis)]. Problems of Theatre. 3-4. Pp. 412-435 (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Maksimenko O.L., Evgrafova Y.A. Inherent Features and the Root Process of the Screen Text as the Audio- Visual Simulation of Reality. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2020;4(4):46-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-4-16-46-56

Views: 701


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2541-8831 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0540 (Online)