China’s Image in Russia: Historical Background

Studying the cultural specificity of the neighboring countries is an important research question for philosophical anthropology and philosophy of culture as it gives a perspective of new possibilities of interaction and partnership in various areas. People’s understanding of a different culture originates from a complex interrelation of consciously chosen strategies and unconsciously projected feelings. The resulting image of the Other culture often plays a significant role in policy-making and helps determine the quality and extent of interrelations, including cooperation, both at the governmental and non-governmental levels. There are multiple ways of constructing such an image. Intensified contacts, that include direct interaction, diplomatic and scientific contacts, lead to the increase of knowledge about neighboring countries’ lifestyle, household organization, and traditions. Art is one of the key means of getting to know another culture. The author pays special attention to visual images, namely political caricature, as interesting yet poorly explored ways of forming the image of China in Russian society’s perception. Herein political caricature, i.e. political visual satire, not only translates the atmosphere of those times but also greatly affects the audience and influences public opinion by creating strong and vivid impressions. Both external and internal images of the self-perception of the Chinese played their role in the development of the perception of China. Their comparative analysis proves that these images underwent a certain evolution in Russia: the image of the neighboring state dynamically altered over the years. Emotional and affective evaluations of China several times drastically changed from positive to negative, and back. The paper explores peculiar features of the political caricature of the 20th century and looks into the ways the imagery shows the Chinese in the light of major political events. It is noted that the images represent both Chinese and Russian historical and cultural context of the epoch. During the period under consideration, the Soviet way of thinking about China mainly came from the logical approach of seeing China as the Other. At the same time, this period is characterized by an increased interest in universal human values of freedom and political independence, the unity of the working population, and the positive outlook on the workpeople’s future. The Chinese middle kingdom in the vein of proletarian internationalism appears a leader fighting for the above-mentioned values. This friendly approach towards China and the possibility of a partnership between the countries remains unquestioned till the 1950s.

1. Prokudin, D. E. and Tolstikova, I. I. (2018) ‘Interaction of cultures in virtual space’, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 34(2), pp. 288–298. doi: 10.21638/11701/spbu17.2018.212. (In Russian).

2. Magu, S. (2015) ‘Reconceptualizing Cultural Globalization: Connecting the “Cultural Global” and the “Cultural Local”’, Social Sciences, 4(3), pp. 630–645. doi: 10.3390/socsci4030630. (In Russian).

3. Bennett, M.J. (2004) ‘Becoming interculturally competent’, in. Wurzel, J.S. (ed.) Toward multiculturalism: a reader in multicultural education. Newton, MA: Intercultural Resource Corporation, 2004. P. 62-77.

4. Palij, I. G. (2006) ‘On the Dialogue of Cultures’, Astrophysical Bulletin, 60–61, pp. 182–186. (In Russian).

5. Vosnyuk, E. B. (2010) ‘Cognition of Culture in the Process of Dialogue’, Izvestiya of Altai State University, (2–1), pp. 159–161. (In Russian).

6. Egorov, V. K. (2020) ‘Yet Again on the Contents of Friend or Foe Dichotomy’, Communicology, 8(1), pp. 138–154. doi: 10.21453/2311-3065-2020-8-1-138-154. (In Russian).

7. Likhachev, D. S. (1989) ‘Vystuplenie na s»ezde narodnykh deputatov SSSR v mae-iiune 1989 g. [Speech at the Congress of People’s Deputies of the USSR in May-June 1989]’, in Ivanov, G. (ed.) Slovo pisatelia : vystupleniia pistelei na S»ezde narodnykh deputatov SSSR [Writer’s word: Writers’ speeches at the Congress of Nar. deputies of the USSR]. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaia lit-ra Publ., pp. 3–9. (In Russian).

8. Siljanovska, L. (2014) ‘Mass Media and Cultural Memory: Idealization of Values’, Култура/Culture, (7), pp. 113–122.

9. Shvetsova, M. G. (2012) ‘Mass Media Role in Creating Country Image’, Journal of Historical, Philological and Cultural Studies, (3), pp. 288–298. (In Russian).

10. Antonyuk, E. Y. (2012) ‘The Evolution of a Country Image in the Philosophical and Culturological Pardigm’, The Bulletin of the Volga Region Institute of Administration, (4), pp. 121–126. (In Russian).

11. Glagolev, V. S. (2017) ‘«Ekologiia kul’tury» — bazovoe uslovie svoevremennykh prognozov i preodoleniia tsivilizatsionnykh riskov. [«Ecology of culture» - a basic condition for modern forecasts and overcoming civilizational risks]’, in Global World: System Shifts, Challenges and Contours of the Future: the 17th International Likhachov Scientific Conference Proceedings, pp. 316–318. (In Russian).

12. Kozlova, A. A. (2015) ‘Imagological Method in Literary and Cultural Research’, Observatory of Culture, (3), pp. 114–118. (In Russian).

13. Tokarev, A. A. et al. (2021) ‘Chinese Foreign Policy Reflected in Images of the Present and the Future: Psychographic Method’, Polis. Political Studies, (1), pp. 58–77. doi: 10.17976/jpps/2021.01.05. (In Russian).

14. Vasilyev, L. S. (ed.) (1974) Istoriia i kultura Kitaia (sbornik pamiati akademika V.P. Vasileva) [Istoriya i kul’tura Kitaya. Sbornik pamyati akademika V.P. Vasil’yeva. 66 / 5000 Результаты перевода History and culture of China. Collection in memory of academician V.P. Vasilyeva]. Moscow: Nauka. GRVL Publ. (In Russian).

15. Tikhvinsky, S. L. (1976) Istoriia Kitaia i sovremennost [Chinese history and modernity]. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian).

16. Glagolev, V. S. (2017b) ‘The Features of Russian Communication with the Far Eastern Partners’, in O Rossii s liubov’iu. Liki Rossii [About Russia with love. Faces of Russia. Conference Proceedings]. Saint Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskii institut vneshneekonomicheskikh sviazei, ekonomiki i prava Publ., pp. 324–331.

17. Blagoder, Y. H. and Mints, S. S. (2011) ‘Image of China in Consciousness of Russian Educated Society of the 17th – early 20th Centuries’, RUDN Journal of Russian History, (3), pp. 110–126. (In Russian).

18. Samoylov, N. A. (2010) ‘Russia and China in the 18th — early 20th centuries: interactive tendencies and mutual impact’, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 13. Asian Studies. African Studies, (2), pp. 3–15. (In Russian).

19. Voskresensky, A. D. (1999) Rossiia i Kitai : teoriia i istoriia mezhgosudarstvennykh otnoshenii [Russia and China: theory and history of interstate relations]. Moscow: Moskovskii obshchestvennyi nauchnyi fond. (In Russian).

20. Mukanova, G. K. (2018) ‘Russia and China on the Way to the Alliance of Civilizations, the end of the ХIХ – early ХХ centuries (on the example of Printed Publications)’, Bylye Gody, 48(2). doi: 10.13187/bg.2018.2.776. (In Russian).

21. Kuznetsova, E. M. (2014) ‘The Problem of Perception of Visual Image’, Science Arts Culture, (3), pp. 190–194. (In Russian).

22. Aksenov, V. B. (2016) ‘The Enemies of Russia in Journals’ Cartoons’, Russian History, (5), pp. 216–222. (In Russian).

23. Pavlov,th D. B. (2011) ‘A.G. Golikov, I.S. Rybchenok. Laughing Is a Serious Matter. Russia and the World of Late 19 – Early 20 th Centuries as Mirrored in Political Cartoons’, Russian History, (3), pp. 192–194. (In Russian).

24. Sidikhmenov, V. (2010) Kitai : stranitsy proshlogo [China: pages of the past]. Smolensk: Rusich. (In Russian).

25. Golubev, A. (2018) ‘Soviet political caricature of the 1920s–1930s’, Russian History, (6), pp. 84–102. doi: 10.31857/S086956870002292-2. (In Russian).

26. Lukin, A. V. (2007) Medved nabljudaet za drakonom obraz Kitaja v Rossii v XVII - XXI vekach [The bear is watching the dragon. The image of China in Russia in the 17th - 21st centuries]. Moscow: Ast. (In Russian).

27. Fedosov, E. A. (2013) ‘Outer world viewed by Soviet propaganda of the 1950s - early 1960s in posters and caricatures’, Tomsk State University Journal of History, (1), pp. 106–109. (In Russian).