Concept Japanese National Character through the Prism of Migration Policy

The strategy and tactics of Japan's contemporary migration policy are determined by the ethnocultural characteristics of the Japanese nation, recognized as the concept of national character (国民性 kokuminsei), which is both a political and scientific entity. The rapid changes in migration policy today expose the practical need to study the causes, consequences, and specifics of related social and political concepts such as national character and the factors that shape it. The accurate knowledge helps predict cultural, political, and socioeconomic changes and future agendas. This concept is a subject of paramount importance for international relations studies, as it is rooted in the Japanese nation's self-consciousness and represents core elements of national history within its interrelation with present policy. The study suggests that the Japanese national character, described and conceptualized in the late Edo period (1603–1868) and the Meiji period (1868–1912), still influences the attitudes of the Japanese towards migration and foreigners in general. The representatives of kokugaku (国学 national study) that originated at that time and nihonjin-ron (日本人論 theories about the Japanese) that developed further sought to assert the authenticity of Japanese culture and its history and construct a national identity. Assumingly, it would become an instrument of protecting the country from the influence of China and later the West. Today, researchers of Japanese culture, both in Japan and abroad, continue to refer to post-war nihonjin-ron, criticizing, rethinking, or adding to its major provisions. Content analysis of the vocabulary used in connection with the concept of national character in official documents regulating the relevant area of social policy, as well as in the media and social networks, has revealed some features of the modern interpretation of this concept. In particular, there are attempts to identify socially significant features of a member of Japanese society. Certain acculturation efforts required from migrants imply the development of the skills that are socially important from the point of view of Japanese society. The comprehensive analysis of measures for the integration and adaptation of migrants implemented by the local governments of Japan has shown that communicative phenomena associated with the concepts of meiwaku (迷惑 causing trouble), omoiyari (思いやり considerate caring for others), as well as the culture of gift-giving and apologizing play an important role in the relationships between Japanese and foreigners. In addition, the analysis of migration policy allows concluding that the concept of coexistence between Japanese and foreigners (多文化共生 tabunka kyousei) currently pursued by the government, despite its promising title, does not quite correspond to multiculturalism in its classical sense, in other words — does not imply deliberate government action to preserve and develop cultural differences within one society.

1. Aalieva, C. T. (2020) ‘Political Aspects of International Migration’, Vestnik Diplomatičeskoj akademii MID KR, (13), pp. 14–18. (In Russian).

2. Alpatov, V. M. (2008) Yaponiija: Yazyk i kul’tura [Japan: language and culture]. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskix kul’tur Publ. (In Russian).

3. Anisimova, N. N. (2019) ‘National Character in the Structure of Identity’, Humanities of the South of Russia, 8(3), pp. 125–132. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.23683/2227-8656.2019.3.12

4. Berry, J. W. (1992) ‘Acculturation and Adaptation in a New Society’, International Migration, 30, pp. 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.1992.tb00776.x

5. Berry, J. W. (2019) Acculturation: a personal journey across cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

6. Bukh, A. (2010) Japan’s National Identity and Foreign Policy. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203883754 (Russ.ed.: (2012) Yaponiya: natsional’naya identichnost’ i vneshnyaya politika: Rossiya kak drugoye Yaponii. Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie Publ.

7. Burgess, C. (2010) ‘The “Illusion” of Homogeneous Japan and National Character: Discourse as a Tool to Transcend the “Myth” vs. “Reality” Binary’, The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, 8(9), p. 23.

8. Castles, S. (2004) ‘The Factors that Make and Unmake Migration Policies’, International Migration Review, 38(3), pp. 852–884. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00222.x

9. Chugrov, S. V. (2009) ‘Anti-"Nihonjin Ron", or New Myths of the Uniqueness of the Japanese Political Culture’, in Japan in the Asia-Pacific Region: Political, Economic and Socio-Cultural Aspects. Moscow: Vostocnaja Literatura Publ., pp. 218–244. (In Russian).

10. Chugrov, S. V. (2010) Yaponiya v poiskakh novoy identichnosti [Japan in search of a new identity]. Moscow: Vostocnaja Lit. Publ. (In Russian).

11. Chugrov, S. V. (2018) ‘Pereosmyslyaya dominanty yaponskoy politicheskoy kul’tury [Rethinking the dominants of Japanese political culture]’, in Yaponskiy fenomen glazami rossiyskikh yaponovedov [Japanese phenomenon through the eyes of Russian Japanologists]. Moscow: Aspekt press Publ., pp. 57–75. (In Russian).

12. Davies, R. J. and Ikeno, O. (2002) ‘The Japanese mind: understanding contemporary Japanese culture’. Boston: Tuttle Pub. (Russ.ed.: (2009) Yaponiia. Kak ee poniat’: Ocherki sovremennoi yaponskoi kul’tury. Moscow: AST: Astrel Publ.).

13. Endriushko, A. A. (2017) ‘Theoretical approaches towards examining the adaptation of migrants to the host society: foreign practices’, VESTNIK INSTITUTA SOTZIOLOGII, 23(4), pp. 45–70. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2017.23.4.480

14. Fine, G. A. (1983) Shared fantasy : role-played games as social worlds. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.

15. Gurevich, T. M. (2005) Chelovek v yaponskom lingvokul’turnom prostranstve [Man in the Japanese linguocultural space]. Moscow: MGIMO University Publ. (In Russian).

16. Gurevich, T. M. (2008) ‘Yaponskaya grammatika kak zerkalo natsional’nogo mentaliteta [Japanese grammar as a mirror of the national mentality]’, Russia and the West: the Dialogue of Cultures, (2), pp. 26–32. (In Russian).

17. Hirai, M. (2000) ‘Stereotypes about the Japanese’, The Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psycology, 39(2), pp. 103–113. (In Japanese). https://doi.org/10.2130/jjesp.39.103

18. Izotova, N. N. (2014a) ‘Problems of transformation of values’ system in modern Japanese society’, MGIMO Review of International Relations, (2(35)), pp. 256–259. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2014-2-35-256-259 (In Russian).

19. Izotova, N. N. (2014b) ‘Tsennostnyye oriyentatsii myshleniya yapontsev [Value Orientations of Japanese Thinking]’, Russia and the West: the Dialogue of Cultures, (7), p. 5. (In Russian).

20. Izotova, N. N. and Likholetova, O. R. (2017) ‘Culture of Gifts as a Reflection of the Japanese`s EtnoCultural Identity’, Manuskript, (3–1), pp. 69–72. (In Russian).

21. Kazufumi, M. and Befu, H. (1993) ‘Japanese Cultural Identity’, Japanstudien, 4(1), pp. 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09386491.1993.11827036

22. Likhachev, D. S. (1984) ‘Patriotizm protiv nacionalizma [Patriotism versus nationalism]’, in Zametki o russkom [Notes about Russian]. Moscow: Sovetskaia Rossiia, pp. 39–44. (In Russian).

23. McCrae, R. R. et al. (2013) ‘The inaccuracy of national character stereotypes’, Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), pp. 831–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.08.006

24. Mescheryakov, А. N. (2005) ‘The Main Distinctive Features of the Japanise Civilized Cultural Model’, Proceedings of the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Far East State University, (9), pp. 225–242. (In Russian).

25. Mescheryakov, А. N. (2015) ‘Osmysleniye sredy obitaniya v protsesse samoidentifikatsii Yaponii i yapontsev [Understanding the Habitat in the Process of Self-Identification of Japan and the Japanese]’, Yearbook Japan, 44, pp. 266–288. (In Russian).

26. Morita, L. (2016) ‘Language Difficulties in kyosei (“living together”) of Japanese and Foreigners’, Studies in Asian Social Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.5430/sass.v3n1p1

27. Nagayoshi, K. (2011) ‘Support of Multiculturalism, But For Whom? Effects of Ethno-National Identity on the Endorsement of Multiculturalism in Japan’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(4), pp. 561–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2011.545272

28. Nagy, S. R. (2012) ‘From Temporary Migrant to Integrated Resident: Local Government Approaches to Migrant Integration in the Tokyo Metropolis’, ASIEN – The German Journal on Contemporary Asia, 124, pp. 115–136.

29. Okada, M. (2020) ‘Hopes and Anxieties Concerning the Increase in International Residents’, The NHK Monthly Report on Broadcast Research, 70(8), pp. 78–87. (In Japanese). https://doi.org/10.24634/bunken.70.8_78

30. Okamoto, M. (2011) ‘Ethnic Identities within Japanese nationals’, Journal of the Faculty of Integrated Human Studies and Social Sciences, Fukuoka Prefectural University, 19(2), pp. 77–98. (In Japanese).

31. Ōshima, H. (2007) ‘Osnovnyye osobennosti istorii yaponskoy mysli [Main features of the history of Japanese thought]’, Ural survey of oriental studies, (2), pp. 25–31. (In Russian).

32. Porshnev, B. F. (1966) Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i istoriya [Social psychology and history]. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).

33. Sakaiya, T. (1992) Chto takoye Yaponiya? [What is Japan?]. Moscow: ITAR-TASS: Firma Partner Co Publ. (In Russian).

34. Shipilova, M. A. (2020) ‘Abe Cabinet migration reforms: minor additions or structural element of Abenomics?’, Japanese Studies in Russia, (3), pp. 44–64. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24411/2500-2872-2020-10019

35. Solonevich, I. L. (2003) Narodnaia monarkhiia [Popular monarchy]. Moscow: EKSMO Publ. (In Russian).

36. Terracciano, A. et al. (2005) ‘National Character Does Not Reflect Mean Personality Trait Levels in 49 Cultures’, Science, 310(5745), pp. 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1117199

37. Uznarodov, D. I. (2014) ‘Migration Processes as a Factor of National Identity’, Bulletin of Higher Education Institutes. Northern-Caucasus Region. Social Sciences, (6), pp. 38–43. (In Russian).

38. Ward, C. and Kennedy, A. (1993) ‘Psychological and Socio-Cultural Adjustment During Cross-Cultural Transitions: A Comparison of Secondary Students Overseas and at Home’, International Journal of Psychology, 28(2), pp. 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207599308247181

39. Ward, C. and Kennedy, A. (1999) ‘The measurement of sociocultural adaptation’, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23(4), pp. 659–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00014-0

40. Yanakova, V. R. (2017) ‘Vliyaniye migratsii na natsional’nuyu identichnost’ [The Impact of Migration on National Identity]’, Nacionalʹnaâ bezopasnostʹ, (4), pp. 1–11. (In Russian).